Evidence mapPaperPMID 38312784Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2024

Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Electronic Medical Record.

Mackenzie Alexiuk, Heba Elgubtan, Navdeep Tangri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Neonatal Surveillance Gaps in Maternal Graves' Disease: Findings From a Queensland Maternity Hospital.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Emergency Department Clinician Preferences in the Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Dynamic Risk Prediction of Graft Failure after Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mackenzie AlexiukChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Heba ElgubtanChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Navdeep TangriChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of clinical decision support (CDS) tools into electronic medical record (EMR) systems has become common. Although there are many benefits for both patients and providers from successful integration, barriers exist that prevent consistent and effective use of these tools. Such barriers include tool alert fatigue, lack of interoperability between tools and medical record systems, and poor acceptance of tools by care providers. However, successful integration of CDS tools into EMR systems have been reported; examples of these include the Statin Choice Decision Aid, and the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE). This article reviews the history of EMR systems and its integration with CDS tools, the barriers preventing successful integration, and the benefits reported from successful integration. This article also provides suggestions and strategies for improving successful integration, making these tools easier to use and more effective for care providers.

Indexed as

clinical decision support toolselectronic medical recordsKidney Failure Risk Equationpredictive modelsrisk predictionStatin Choice Decision Aid

Identifiers

PMID38312784
PMCPMC10831391

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.