Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313008›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Electrical stimulation promoting the angiogenesis in diabetic rat perforator flap through attenuating oxidative stress-mediated inflammation and apoptosis.

Cong Chen, Xiaolu Li, Yong Hu, Yuan Chen, Hongrui Wang, Xian Li, Xiucun Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Accelerated Bone Healing via Electrical Stimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in electrical stimulation for wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cong ChenSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiaolu LiSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yong HuSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yuan ChenSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hongrui WangSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xian LiSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiucun LiSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3260-6299
Second Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin flap transplantation is one of the effective methods to treat the diabetes-related foot ulceration, but the intrinsic damage to vessels in diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to the necrosis of skin flaps. Therefore, the discovery of a non-invasive and effective approach for promoting the survival of flaps is of the utmost importance. Electrical stimulation (ES) promotes angiogenesis and increases the proliferation, migration, and elongation of endothelial cells, thus being a potential effective method to improve flap survival. Objective: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanism used by ES to effectively restore the impaired function of endothelial cells caused by diabetes. Methods: A total of 79 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study. Gene and protein expression was assessed by PCR and western blotting, respectively. Immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin-eosin staining were performed to evaluate the morphology and density of the microvessels in the flap. Results: The optimal duration for preconditioning the flap with ES was 7 days. The flap survival area percentage and microvessels density in the DMES group were markedly increased compared to the DM group. VEGF, MMP2, and MMP9 protein expression was significantly upregulated. ROS intensity was significantly decreased and GSH concentration was increased. The expression of IL-1β, MCP‑1, cleaved caspase-3, and Bax were downregulated in the DMES group, while TGF-β expression was upregulated. Conclusions: ES improves the angiogenesis in diabetic ischemic skin flaps by attenuating oxidative stress-mediated inflammation and apoptosis, eventually increasing their viability.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusImidazolesOrganosilicon CompoundsPerforator FlapAngiogenesisAnimalsApoptosisElectric StimulationEndothelial CellsInflammationMaleNeovascularization, PhysiologicOxidative StressRatsRats, Sprague-DawleydimethylethylsilylimidazoleImidazolesOrganosilicon CompoundsAngiogenesisDiabetic ischemic skin flapsElectrical stimulationInflammationOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID38313008
PMCPMC10838069
OpenAlexW4391400790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.