Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313034›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Understanding park visitors' soundscape perception using subjective and objective measurement.

Lauren A Ferguson, B Derrick Taff, Justine I Blanford, Daniel J Mennitt, Andrew J Mowen, Mitchell Levenhagen, Crow White, Christopher A Monz, Clinton D Francis, Jesse R Barber and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Assessment of Noise Exposure in United States Urban Public Parks: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren A FergusonRecreation Management and Policy Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States of America.
B Derrick TaffDepartment of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management, Pennsylvania State University, PA, United States of America.
Justine I BlanfordGeo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Daniel J MennittMechanical Engineering, Exponent, Inc., Denver, CO, United States of America.
Andrew J MowenDepartment of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management, Pennsylvania State University, PA, United States of America.
Mitchell LevenhagenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Crow WhiteBiological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America.
Christopher A MonzDepartment of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States of America.
Clinton D FrancisBiological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America.
Jesse R BarberDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States of America.
Peter NewmanDepartment of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management, Pennsylvania State University, PA, United States of America.
Pennsylvania State University · USBoise State University · USCalifornia Polytechnic State University · USExponent (United States) · USUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Twente · NLUtah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental noise knows no boundaries, affecting even protected areas. Noise pollution, originating from both external and internal sources, imposes costs on these areas. It is associated with adverse health effects, while natural sounds contribute to cognitive and emotional improvements as ecosystem services. When it comes to parks, individual visitors hold unique perceptions of soundscapes, which can be shaped by various factors such as their motivations for visiting, personal norms, attitudes towards specific sounds, and expectations. In this study, we utilized linear models and geospatial data to evaluate how visitors' personal norms and attitudes, the park's acoustic environment, visitor counts, and the acoustic environment of visitors' neighborhoods influenced their perception of soundscapes at Muir Woods National Monument. Our findings indicate that visitors' subjective experiences had a greater impact on their perception of the park's soundscape compared to purely acoustic factors like sound level of the park itself. Specifically, we found that motivations to hear natural sounds, interference caused by noise, sensitivity to noise, and the sound levels of visitors' home neighborhoods influenced visitors' perception of the park's soundscape. Understanding how personal factors shape visitors' soundscape perception can assist urban and non-urban park planners in effectively managing visitor experiences and expectations.

Indexed as

EcosystemRecreationConservation of Natural ResourcesNoisePerceptionGeospatialHuman perceptionNational parkNoise senstivityParks and protected areasSoundscapes

Identifiers

PMID38313034
PMCPMC10838067
OpenAlexW4391401641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.