Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313698›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Improvements for recording retinal function with Microelectrode Arrays.

D L Rathbun, A Jalligampala, E Zrenner, Z Hosseinzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptation of visual responses in degeneratingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D L RathbunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Detroit Institute of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
A JalligampalaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
E ZrennerInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Z HosseinzadehDepartment of Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A microelectrode array (MEA) is a configuration of multiple electrodes that enables the concurrent targeting of multiple sites for extracellular recording and stimulation. By utilizing light pulses or electrical stimulations, MEA recordings unveil the complex patterns of electrical activities that arise from the signaling processes within the retinal network. Here, we present a stepwise approach for using microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for recording action potentials from the mouse retina in response to electrical and light stimuli. We provide detailed techniques accompanied by description of a custom optical system, example recordings, troubleshooting guidelines, and data processing methods including spike sorting and code resources for analyzing light and electrical responses. The comprehensive nature of this paper aims to guide researchers in utilizing MEAs effectively for investigating retinal functionality. In particular, it can be easy to have a MEA experiment fail, but hard to identify the source of the failure. This paper is meant to demystify that process. It includes:•A description of MEA setup, recording, and spike data validation.•A troubleshooting guide for common failure modes in MEA recordings from mouse retina.•Spike detection and sorting to precisely extract distinctive action potential.

Indexed as

Action potentialElectrophysiologyMicroelectrode arraysRetinaRetinal Recoding with Microelectrode Arrays

Identifiers

PMID38313698
PMCPMC10834997

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.