Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38313755›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Primary Versus Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Autograft: A Matched-Control Cohort Study.

Amit Meena, Luca Farinelli, Christian Hoser, Elisabeth Abermann, Caroline Hepperger, Mohit Kumar Patralekh, Mirco Herbort, Christian Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit MeenaGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.
Luca FarinelliClinical Orthopedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences. Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Christian HoserGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth AbermannGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.
Caroline HeppergerGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mohit Kumar PatralekhCentral Institute of Orthopedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Mirco HerbortResearch Unit for Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Injury Prevention (OSMI), Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian FinkGelenkpunkt-Sports and Joint Surgery, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing, and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is gaining popularity for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. Purpose: To evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, concomitant injuries, and graft failure in primary versus revision ACL surgery using QT autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 376 patients with primary ACL reconstruction and 138 patients with revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected ACL registry. A minimally invasive technique was used for QT autograft harvesting. The surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol were identical in both groups. To maintain a homogeneous cohort for the study, the groups were matched by age, sex, and preinjury outcome scores (Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain). Initial baseline assessments of outcome scores were compared with scores collected at the 2-year postoperative mark. Results: The mean age of the primary group and revision group was 32.9 ± 10.2 years (range, 18-55 years) and 32.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 19-55 years) respectively. Significant preinjury to postoperative improvements were noted in Lysholm (88.2 ± 16.4 vs 83.5 ± 15.0; Conclusion: Both primary and revision ACL reconstruction with QT autograft had acceptable functional outcomes. The primary group had better outcomes than the revision group, possibly due to the lower prevalence of meniscal and cartilage injuries in the primary group compared with the revision group. The revision group was associated with higher graft failure than the primary group. QT autograft is a viable graft choice for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

ACLanterior cruciate ligamentQT autograftquadriceps graftrevision ACL

Identifiers

PMID38313755
PMCPMC10836136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.