Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316554›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2024

Reactive Astrocytes and Emerging Roles in Central Nervous System (CNS) Disorders.

Shane A Liddelow, Michelle L Olsen, Michael V Sofroniew

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shane A LiddelowNeuroscience Institute, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA shane.liddelow@nyulangone.org molsen1@vt.edu sofroniew@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-1437
Michelle L OlsenSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA shane.liddelow@nyulangone.org molsen1@vt.edu sofroniew@mednet.ucla.edu.
Michael V SofroniewDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA shane.liddelow@nyulangone.org molsen1@vt.edu sofroniew@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to their many functions in the healthy central nervous system (CNS), astrocytes respond to CNS damage and disease through a process called "reactivity." Recent evidence reveals that astrocyte reactivity is a heterogeneous spectrum of potential changes that occur in a context-specific manner. These changes are determined by diverse signaling events and vary not only with the nature and severity of different CNS insults but also with location in the CNS, genetic predispositions, age, and potentially also with "molecular memory" of previous reactivity events. Astrocyte reactivity can be associated with both essential beneficial functions as well as with harmful effects. The available information is rapidly expanding and much has been learned about molecular diversity of astrocyte reactivity. Emerging functional associations point toward central roles for astrocyte reactivity in determining the outcome in CNS disorders.

Indexed as

AstrocytesCentral Nervous System DiseasesAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID38316554
PMCPMC11216178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.