Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38316655›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Deep learning algorithm-based multimodal MRI radiomics and pathomics data improve prediction of bone metastases in primary prostate cancer.

Yun-Feng Zhang, Chuan Zhou, Sheng Guo, Chao Wang, Jin Yang, Zhi-Jun Yang, Rong Wang, Xu Zhang, Feng-Hai Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A highly interpretable machine learning model for predicting lung cancer bone metastasis: uncovering the synergistic effect of routine biochemical markers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Precision medicine in prostate cancer: individualized treatment through radiomics, genomics, and biomarkers.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yun-Feng Zhang *The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Chuan Zhou *The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Sheng GuoThe First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Chao WangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jin YangThe First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Zhi-Jun YangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Rong WangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Xu ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Feng-Hai ZhouThe First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, China. ldyy_zhoufh@lzu.edu.cn.
Lanzhou University · CNGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNGansu Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Science and Technology Program in Gansu Province NO.21YF5FA016Research Fund Project of Internal Medicine Department, Gansu Provincial Hospital 22GSSYD-15The Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province No.22JR5RA650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone metastasis is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in advanced prostate cancer, and early diagnosis is challenging due to its insidious onset. The use of machine learning to obtain prognostic information from pathological images has been highlighted. However, there is a limited understanding of the potential of early prediction of bone metastasis through the feature combination method from various sources. This study presents a method of integrating multimodal data to enhance the feasibility of early diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Overall, 211 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) at Gansu Provincial Hospital between January 2017 and February 2023 were included in this study. The patients were randomized (8:2) into a training group (n = 169) and a validation group (n = 42). The region of interest (ROI) were segmented from the three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (T2WI, DWI, and ADC), and pathological features were extracted from tissue sections (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining, 10 × 20). A deep learning (DL) model using ResNet 50 was employed to extract deep transfer learning (DTL) features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method was utilized for feature selection, feature construction, and reducing feature dimensions. Different machine learning classifiers were used to build predictive models. The performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The net clinical benefit was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). The goodness of fit was evaluated using calibration curves. A joint model nomogram was eventually developed by combining clinically independent risk factors.

resultsThe best prediction models based on DTL and pathomics features showed area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.799-0.989) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.714-0.989), respectively. The AUC for the best prediction model based on radiomics features and combining radiomics features, DTL features, and pathomics features were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.735-0.979) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.854-1.000), respectively. Based on DCA and calibration curves, the model demonstrated good net clinical benefit and fit.

conclusionMultimodal radiomics and pathomics serve as valuable predictors of the risk of bone metastases in patients with primary PCa.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDeep LearningProstatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBone metastasisDeep learningMachine learningPathomicsProstate cancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38316655
PMCPMC10844393
OpenAlexW4391542772

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.