Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38317713›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Osteoporosis guidelines on TCM drug therapies: a systematic quality evaluation and content analysis.

Luan Zhang, Jiahui Li, Runsheng Xie, Lingfeng Zeng, Wenjia Chen, Hui Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luan ZhangThe Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahui LiThe Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Runsheng XieResearch Team of Chinese Medicine Standardization, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lingfeng ZengThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjia ChenResearch Team of Chinese Medicine Standardization, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiResearch Team of Chinese Medicine Standardization, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of osteoporosis guidelines on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) drug therapies and to analyze the specific recommendations of these guidelines. Methods: We systematically collected guidelines, evaluated the quality of the guidelines using the Results and conclusions: A total of 20 guidelines were included. Overall quality evaluation results revealed that four guidelines were at level A, four at level B, and 12 at level C, whose quality needed to be improved in the domains of "stakeholder involvement", "rigor of development", "applicability" and "editorial independence". Stratified analysis suggested that the post-2020 guidelines were significantly better than those published before 2020 in the domains of "scope and purpose", "stakeholder involvement" and "editorial independence". Guidelines with evidence systems were significantly better than those without evidence systems in terms of "stakeholder involvement", "rigor of development", "clarity of presentation" and "applicability". The guidelines recommended TCM drug therapies for patients with osteopenia, osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Recommended TCM drugs were mainly Chinese patent medicine alone or combined with Western medicine, with the outcome mainly focused on improving bone mineral density (BMD).

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalOsteoporosisPractice Guidelines as TopicDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansDrugs, Chinese Herbalguidelinesosteoporosisquality evaluationrecommendationsstratified analysisTCM drug therapies

Identifiers

PMID38317713
PMCPMC10839061
OpenAlexW4391108627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.