Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38319289›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2024

The Reach of Calls and Text Messages for Mailed FIT Outreach in the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.

Gloria D Coronado, Denis B Nyongesa, Amanda F Petrik, Jamie H Thompson, Anne L Escaron, Tuan Pham, Michael C Leo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-6542
Denis B NyongesaKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0009-0006-7815-7966
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-8891-6042
Jamie H ThompsonKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-4880
Anne L EscaronAltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-0750
Tuan PhamAltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0009-0001-8319-225X
Michael C LeoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-7052-8183

Funding

Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer PreventionU01MD010665 · NIMHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) U01MD010665NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD010665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer screening participation. We assessed the reach and effectiveness of adding notifications to mailed FIT programs.

methodsWe conducted secondary analyses of a stepped-wedge evaluation of an enhanced mailed FIT program (n = 15 clinics). Patients were stratified by prior FIT completion. Those with prior FIT were sent a text message (Group 1); those without were randomized 1:1 to receive a text message (Group 2) or live phone call (Group 3). All groups were sent automated phone call reminders. In stratified analysis, we measured reach and effectiveness (FIT completion within 6 months) and assessed patient-level associations using generalized estimating equations.

resultsPatients (n = 16,934; 83% Latino; 72% completed prior FIT) were reached most often by text messages (78%), followed by live phone calls (71%), then automated phone calls (56%). FIT completion was higher in patients with prior FIT completion versus without [44% (Group 1) vs. 19% (Group 2 + Group 3); P < 0.01]. For patients without prior FIT, effectiveness was higher in those allocated to a live phone call [20% (Group 3) vs. 18% (Group 2) for text message; P = 0.04] and in those who personally answered the live call (28% vs. 9% no call completed; P < 0.01).

conclusionsText messages reached the most patients, yet effectiveness was highest in those who personally answered the live phone call. IMPACT: Despite the broad reach and low cost of text messages, personalized approaches may more successfully boost FIT completion.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsText MessagingEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodReminder Systems

Identifiers

PMID38319289
PMCPMC12646393

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.