Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38320615›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Unpacking the navigation toolbox: insights from comparative cognition.

Kate J Jeffery, Ken Cheng, Nora S Newcombe, Verner P Bingman, Randolf Menzel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inter-turn intervals inCommunicative & integrative biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate J JefferySchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9495-0378
Ken ChengSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4913-2691
Nora S NewcombeDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Verner P BingmanJ.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403-0001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5295-7096
Randolf MenzelInstitute for Biology, Neurobiology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Australian Research CouncilNational Science Foundation EHR 1660996National Science Foundation EHR 2300937ONR MURI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of navigation is informed by ethological data from many species, laboratory investigation at behavioural and neurobiological levels, and computational modelling. However, the data are often species-specific, making it challenging to develop general models of how biology supports behaviour. Wiener

Indexed as

CognitionSpatial NavigationAnimalsComputer SimulationHumanscognitive mapnavigationroutespatial cognitionvectorwayfinding

Identifiers

PMID38320615
PMCPMC10846957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.