Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38320723›Full record

Trial reportGastroenterology2024

A Randomized Trial of Two Remote Health Care Delivery Models on the Uptake of Genetic Testing and Impact on Patient-Reported Psychological Outcomes in Families With Pancreatic Cancer: The Genetic Education, Risk Assessment, and Testing (GENERATE) Study.

Nicolette J Rodriguez, C Sloane Furniss, Matthew B Yurgelun, Chinedu Ukaegbu, Pamela E Constantinou, Ileana Fortes, Alyson Caruso, Alison N Schwartz, Jill E Stopfer, Meghan Underhill-Blazey and 18 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03762590 (GENetic Education Risk Assessment and TEsting Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03762590 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

GENetic Education Risk Assessment and TEsting Study (GENERATE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2019 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsCandidates for Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer TestingArmsDoxy.me genetic education +/- Color Genomics genetic education, Color Genomics genetic education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Mainstreaming genetic testing in community oncology settings.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolette J RodriguezDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
C Sloane FurnissDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew B YurgelunDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chinedu UkaegbuDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pamela E ConstantinouSheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ileana FortesDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alyson CarusoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alison N SchwartzDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jill E StopferDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meghan Underhill-BlazeyUniversity of Rochester, School of Nursing, Rochester, New York.
Barbara KennerKenner Family Research Fund, New York, New York.
Scott H NelsonPancreatic Cancer Action Network Volunteer, Patient Advocate, and Pancreatic Cancer Survivor.
Sydney OkumuraColor Genomics, Burlingame, California.
Alicia Y ZhouColor Genomics, Burlingame, California.
Tara B CoffinWIRB-Copernicus Group Institutional Review Board, Puyallup, Washington.
Hajime UnoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Miki HoriguchiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Allyson J OceanWeill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.
Florencia McAllisterSheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Andrew M LowyMoores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California.
Alison P KleinJohns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lisa MadlenskyMoores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California.
Gloria M PetersenMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota.
Judy E GarberDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Scott M LippmanMoores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California.
Michael G GogginsJohns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anirban MaitraSheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sapna SyngalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: Sapna_Syngal@dfci.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUC San Diego Health System · USJohns Hopkins University · USCornell University · USMayo Clinic · USPancreatic Cancer Action Network · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH D · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
Tissue CoreP50CA102701 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MUKHOPADHYAY, DEBABRATA · 2004 to 2018
$32.7M
Using markers to improve pancreatic cancer screening and surveillance: a multi-center studyU01CA210170 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G. Goggins · 2016 to 2026
$9.3M
CTSA K12 Program at Harvard Medical SchoolK12TR004381 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Karen K Miller · 2023 to 2026
$6.5M
ALIMENTARY TRACT RESEARCH IN HEALTH AND DISEASET32DK007533 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BLUMBERG, RICHARD S · 1986 to 2020
$5.3M
Using Markers to Improve Pancreatic Cancer ScreeningR01CA176828 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOGGINS, MICHAEL G. · 2013 to 2024
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004381NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS P50 CA102701NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176828NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210170NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsGenetic testing uptake for cancer susceptibility in family members of patients with cancer is suboptimal. Among relatives of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), The GENetic Education, Risk Assessment, and TEsting (GENERATE) study evaluated 2 online genetic education/testing delivery models and their impact on patient-reported psychological outcomes.

methodsEligible participants had ≥1 first-degree relative with PDAC, or ≥1 first-/second-degree relative with PDAC with a known pathogenic germline variant in 1 of 13 PDAC predisposition genes. Participants were randomized by family, between May 8, 2019, and June 1, 2021. Arm 1 participants underwent a remote interactive telemedicine session and online genetic education. Arm 2 participants were offered online genetic education only. All participants were offered germline testing. The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake, compared by permutation tests and mixed-effects logistic regression models. We hypothesized that Arm 1 participants would have a higher genetic testing uptake than Arm 2. Validated surveys were administered to assess patient-reported anxiety, depression, and cancer worry at baseline and 3 months postintervention.

resultsA total of 424 families were randomized, including 601 participants (n = 296 Arm 1; n = 305 Arm 2), 90% of whom completed genetic testing (Arm 1 [87%]; Arm 2 [93%], P = .014). Arm 1 participants were significantly less likely to complete genetic testing compared with Arm 2 participants (adjusted ratio [Arm1/Arm2] 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.98). Among participants who completed patient-reported psychological outcomes questionnaires (Arm 1 [n = 194]; Arm 2 [n = 206]), the intervention did not affect mean anxiety, depression, or cancer worry scores.

conclusionsRemote genetic education and testing can be a successful and complementary option for delivering genetics care. (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03762590).

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingPancreatic NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTelemedicineAdultAgedAnxietyDepressionFamilyFemaleGenetic CounselingGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleCascade Genetic TestingHealthcare Delivery

Identifiers

PMID38320723
PMCPMC11034726
OpenAlexW4391539486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.