Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38321741›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2024

High-quality genomes of Bombax ceiba and Ceiba pentandra provide insights into the evolution of Malvaceae species and differences in their natural fiber development.

Lei Shao, Shangkun Jin, Jinwen Chen, Guangsui Yang, Rui Fan, Zhiyuan Zhang, Qian Deng, Jin Han, Xiaowei Ma, Zeyu Dong and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-wide identification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Highly Efficient Regeneration ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lei ShaoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Shangkun JinZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jinwen ChenZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Guangsui YangTropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Rui FanSpices and Beverages Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning 571533, China.
Zhiyuan ZhangHainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Qian DengZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Jin HanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xiaowei MaZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zeyu DongZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Hejun LuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Wanying HuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Kai WangSchool of Life Sciences, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.
Lisong HuSpices and Beverages Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning 571533, China.
Zhen ShenTropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Surong HuangTropical Crop Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China.
Ting ZhaoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Xueying GuanZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Yan HuZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Tianzhen ZhangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China.
Lei FangZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources, Institute of Crop Science, Plant Precision Breeding Academy, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Sanya 572025, China. Electronic address: fangl@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CNNantong University · CNSanya University · CN

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the Malvaceae family, including Corchorus spp., Gossypium spp., Bombax spp., and Ceiba spp., are important sources of natural fibers. In the past decade, the genomes of several Malvaceae species have been assembled; however, the evolutionary history of Malvaceae species and the differences in their fiber development remain to be clarified. Here, we report the genome assembly and annotation of two natural fiber plants from the Malvaceae, Bombax ceiba and Ceiba pentandra, whose assembled genome sizes are 783.56 Mb and 1575.47 Mb, respectively. Comparative analysis revealed that whole-genome duplication and Gypsy long terminal repeat retroelements have been the major causes of differences in chromosome number (2n = 14 to 2n = 96) and genome size (234 Mb to 2676 Mb) among Malvaceae species. We also used comparative genomic analyses to reconstruct the ancestral Malvaceae karyotype with 11 proto-chromosomes, providing new insights into the evolutionary trajectories of Malvaceae species. MYB-MIXTA-like 3 is relatively conserved among the Malvaceae and functions in fiber cell-fate determination in the epidermis. It appears to perform this function in any tissue where it is expressed, i.e. in fibers on the endocarp of B. ceiba and in ovule fibers of cotton. We identified a structural variation in a cellulose synthase gene and a higher copy number of cellulose synthase-like genes as possible causes of the finer, less spinnable, weaker fibers of B. ceiba. Our study provides two high-quality genomes of natural fiber plants and offers insights into the evolution of Malvaceae species and differences in their natural fiber formation and development through multi-omics analysis.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyancestral karyotypefiber differentiationgenome evolutionMalvaceae species

Identifiers

PMID38321741
PMCPMC11121743
OpenAlexW4391530010

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.