Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38323508›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2024

The Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) score as a predictor for cognitive decline and potential surrogate outcome in the FINGER lifestyle randomized controlled trial.

Anette Hall, Mariagnese Barbera, Jenni Lehtisalo, Riitta Antikainen, Hamidul Huque, Tiina Laatikainen, Tiia Ngandu, Hilkka Soininen, Ruth Stephen, Timo Strandberg and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Anette HallDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Mariagnese BarberaDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-1294
Jenni LehtisaloPopulation Health Unit, Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Riitta AntikainenCenter for Life Course Health Research/Geriatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Hamidul HuqueSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tiina LaatikainenPopulation Health Unit, Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiia NganduDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hilkka SoininenDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ruth StephenDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Timo StrandbergUniversity of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Miia KivipeltoDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kaarin J AnsteySchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alina SolomonDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIUNSW Sydney · AUFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEOulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

European Research Council 804371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe complex aetiology of Alzheimer's disease suggests prevention potential. Risk scores have potential as risk stratification tools and surrogate outcomes in multimodal interventions targeting specific at-risk populations. The Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) was tested in relation to cognition and its suitability as a surrogate outcome in a multidomain lifestyle randomized controlled trial, in older adults at risk of dementia.

methodsIn this post hoc analysis of the Finnish Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER), ANU-ADRI was calculated at baseline, 12, and 24 months (n = 1174). The association between ANU-ADRI and cognition (at baseline and over time), the intervention effect on changes in ANU-ADRI, and the potential impact of baseline ANU-ADRI on the intervention effect on changes in cognition were assessed using linear mixed models with maximum likelihood estimation.

resultsA higher ANU-ADRI was significantly related to worse cognition, at baseline (e.g., estimate for global cognition [95% confidence interval] was -0.028 [-0.032 to -0.025]) and over the 2-year study (e.g., estimate for 2-year changes in ANU-ADRI and per-year changes in global cognition [95% confidence interval] was -0.068 [-0.026 to -0.108]). No significant beneficial intervention effect was reported for ANU-ADRI, and baseline ANU-ADRI did not significantly affect the response to the intervention on changes in cognition.

conclusionsThe ANU-ADRI was effective for the risk prediction of cognitive decline. Risk scores may be crucial for the success of novel dementia prevention strategies, but their algorithm, the target population, and the intervention design should be carefully considered when choosing the appropriate tool for each context.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAustraliaCognitionHumansLife StyleUniversitiesAlzheimer'sclinical trialscognition

Identifiers

PMID38323508
PMCPMC11235774
OpenAlexW4391604763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.