Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324017›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2024

Cell-based Therapies for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Where Are We Now?

Gerard F Curley, Cecilia M O'Kane, Daniel F McAuley, Michael A Matthay, John G Laffey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Progenitor Resilience and the Early Onset of Chronic Lung Diseases: NHLBI workshop report.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Unlocking the Therapeutic Code of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Unraveling the Complexities of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-based Therapies: One Size Doesn't Fit All.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Critical Care: A Second Special Issue of the Blue Journal.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gerard F CurleyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Cecilia M O'KaneWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Michael A MatthayDepartment of Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
John G LaffeyDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Saolta University Healthcare System, Galway, Ireland; and.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-9573
Queen's University Belfast · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IESaolta University Health Care Group · IEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 16-FRL-3845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the potential for cell-based therapies, particularly mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and their products, as a therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MSCs exert effects via diverse mechanisms including reducing excessive inflammation by modulating neutrophil, macrophage and T-cell function, decreasing pulmonary permeability and lung edema, and promoting tissue repair. Clinical studies indicate that MSCs are safe and well tolerated, with promising therapeutic benefits in specific clinical settings, leading to regulatory approvals of MSCs for specific indications in some countries.This perspective reassesses the therapeutic potential of MSC-based therapies for ARDS given insights from recent cell therapy trials in both COVID-19 and in 'classic' ARDS, and discusses studies in graft-vs.-host disease, one of the few licensed indications for MSC therapies. We identify important unknowns in the current literature, address challenges to clinical translation, and propose an approach to facilitate assessment of the therapeutic promise of MSC-based therapies for ARDS.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryCOVID-19Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRespiratory Distress SyndromeCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansLungARDS therapiescell therapymesenchymal stem cellsmesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID38324017
PMCPMC10995569
OpenAlexW4391598256

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.