Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324356›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Explainable Machine Learning Classification to Identify Vulnerable Groups Among Parenting Mothers: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Akiko Hanai, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Shoko Sugao, Makoto Fujii, Kei Hirai, Hiroko Watanabe, Masayo Matsuzaki, Goji Nakamoto, Toshihiro Takeda, Yasuji Kitabatake and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Akiko HanaiMedical Data Mathematical Reasoning Team, Advanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4468-1488
Tetsuo IshikawaMedical Data Mathematical Reasoning Team, Advanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-5387
Shoko SugaoGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-5437
Makoto FujiiDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4436-7456
Kei HiraiGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-2840
Hiroko WatanabeDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-627X
Masayo MatsuzakiDepartment of Reproductive Health Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-8852
Goji NakamotoDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6257-2395
Toshihiro TakedaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3073-7823
Yasuji KitabatakeDepartment of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-9512
Yuichi ItohDepartment of Integrated Information Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-8986
Masayuki Endo *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-8362
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-9078
Eiryo Kawakami *Medical Data Mathematical Reasoning Team, Advanced Data Science Project, RIKEN Information R&D and Strategy Headquarters, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-4342
The University of Osaka · JPChiba University · JPOsaka University of Human Sciences · JPAoyama Gakuin University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne life event that requires extensive resilience and adaptation is parenting. However, resilience and perceived support in child-rearing vary, making the real-world situation unclear, even with postpartum checkups.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the psychosocial status of mothers during the child-rearing period from newborn to toddler, with a classifier based on data on the resilience and adaptation characteristics of mothers with newborns.

methodsA web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. Mothers with newborns aged approximately 1 month (newborn cohort) were analyzed to construct an explainable machine learning classifier to stratify parenting-related resilience and adaptation characteristics and identify vulnerable populations. Explainable k-means clustering was used because of its high explanatory power and applicability. The classifier was applied to mothers with infants aged 2 months to 1 year (infant cohort) and mothers with toddlers aged >1 year to 2 years (toddler cohort). Psychosocial status, including depressed mood assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), bonding assessed by the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ), and sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between the classified groups, was compared.

resultsA total of 1559 participants completed the survey. They were split into 3 cohorts, comprising populations of various characteristics, including parenting difficulties and psychosocial measures. The classifier, which stratified participants into 5 groups, was generated from the self-reported scores of resilience and adaptation in the newborn cohort (n=310). The classifier identified that the group with the greatest difficulties in resilience and adaptation to a child's temperament and perceived support had higher incidences of problems with depressed mood (relative prevalence [RP] 5.87, 95% CI 2.77-12.45), bonding (RP 5.38, 95% CI 2.53-11.45), and sleep quality (RP 1.70, 95% CI 1.20-2.40) compared to the group with no difficulties in perceived support. In the infant cohort (n=619) and toddler cohort (n=461), the stratified group with the greatest difficulties had higher incidences of problems with depressed mood (RP 9.05, 95% CI 4.36-18.80 and RP 4.63, 95% CI 2.38-9.02, respectively), bonding (RP 1.63, 95% CI 1.29-2.06 and RP 3.19, 95% CI 2.03-5.01, respectively), and sleep quality (RP 8.09, 95% CI 4.62-16.37 and RP 1.72, 95% CI 1.23-2.42, respectively) compared to the group with no difficulties.

conclusionsThe classifier, based on a combination of resilience and adaptation to the child's temperament and perceived support, was able identify psychosocial vulnerable groups in the newborn cohort, the start-up stage of childcare. Psychosocially vulnerable groups were also identified in qualitatively different infant and toddler cohorts, depending on their classifier. The vulnerable group identified in the infant cohort showed particularly high RP for depressed mood and poor sleep quality.

Indexed as

adaptationantenatalchildrendepressiondigital healthexplainable machine-learninginfantmachine learningmaternalmobile phonemothermother’s healthnewbornparentingparentsperceived supportpostpartumpsychosocialresiliencesurveyunsupervised clusteringweb-basedwomen

Identifiers

PMID38324356
PMCPMC10882468
OpenAlexW4390072252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.