Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38324906›Full record

ReviewJournal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection2024

Mathematical complexities in radionuclide metabolic modelling: a review of ordinary differential equation kinetics solvers in biokinetic modelling.

Emmanuel Matey Mate-Kole, Shaheen Azim Dewji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reconstructing strontium-90 intake in beagles using neural networks: a data-driven assessment of historical inhalation records.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2025
    Article
  3. Machine learning-enhanced stochastic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the ICRP human respiratory tract model for an inhaled radionuclide.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emmanuel Matey Mate-KoleNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-6559
Shaheen Azim DewjiNuclear and Radiological Engineering and Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-5877

Funding

Project 4: Post-Exposure Biomarkers and Remediation of Radionuclide ContaminantsP01AI165380 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WESLEY E BOLCH · 2022 to 2026
$12.9M
Department of Defense W81XWH-21-1-0984NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI165380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biokinetic models have been employed in internal dosimetry (ID) to model the human body's time-dependent retention and excretion of radionuclides. Consequently, biokinetic models have become instrumental in modelling the body burden from biological processes from internalized radionuclides for prospective and retrospective dose assessment. Solutions to biokinetic equations have been modelled as a system of coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) representing the time-dependent distribution of materials deposited within the body. In parallel, several mathematical algorithms were developed for solving general kinetic problems, upon which biokinetic solution tools were constructed. This paper provides a comprehensive review of mathematical solving methods adopted by some known internal dose computer codes for modelling the distribution and dosimetry for internal emitters, highlighting the mathematical frameworks, capabilities, and limitations. Further discussion details the mathematical underpinnings of biokinetic solutions in a unique approach paralleling advancements in ID. The capabilities of available mathematical solvers in computational systems were also emphasized. A survey of ODE forms, methods, and solvers was conducted to highlight capabilities for advancing the utilization of modern toolkits in ID. This review is the first of its kind in framing the development of biokinetic solving methods as the juxtaposition of mathematical solving schemes and computational capabilities, highlighting the evolution in biokinetic solving for radiation dose assessment.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalRadioisotopesAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansKineticsRadiometryRadioisotopesbiokinetic modelsdose reconstructionICRPinternal dosimetryODE solversordinary differential equationsPBPK

Identifiers

PMID38324906
PMCPMC11214694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.