ArticlePlant communications2024
Multiple factors interact in editing of PPR-E+-targeted sites in maize mitochondria and plastids.
Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kingdom-wide evolutionary characterization of RNA editing factors in Archaeplastida.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in crops: Advances in functional mechanisms and breeding applications.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Decades' progress and prospects on maize functional genomics and molecular breeding.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in plants: Cellular functions, action mechanisms, and potential applications.Plant communications · 2025Review
- Seeing the unseen in characterizing RNA editome during rice endosperm development.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
RNA cytidine-to-uridine editing is essential for plant organellar gene expression. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-E+ proteins have been proposed to bind to target sites and recruit the cytidine deaminase AtDYW2, facilitated by AtNUWA. Here we analyze the function of ZmNUWA, ZmDYW2A, and ZmDYW2B and their relationships with other editing factors in maize. The zmdyw2a and zmdyw2b single mutants are normal, but the zmdyw2a::zmdyw2b and zmnuwa mutants are severely arrested in seed development. ZmNUWA, ZmDYW2A, and ZmDYW2B are dual localized in mitochondria and plastids. Loss of ZmNUWA decreases the editing at 99 mitochondrial sites and 8 plastid sites. Surprisingly, loss of ZmDYW2A:ZmDYW2B affects almost the same set of sites targeted by PPR-E+ proteins. ZmNUWA interacts with ZmDYW2A and ZmDYW2B, suggesting that ZmNUWA recruits ZmDYW2A/2B in the editing of PPR-E+-targeted sites in maize. Further protein interaction analyses show that ZmNUWA and ZmDYW2A/2B interact with ZmMORF1, ZmMORF8, ZmMORF2, and ZmMORF9 and that ZmOZ1 interacts with ZmORRM1, ZmDYW2A, ZmDYW2B, ZmMORF8, and ZmMORF9. These results suggest that the maize mitochondrial PPR-E+ editosome contains PPR-E+, ZmDYW2A/2B, ZmNUWA, and ZmMORF1/8, whereas the plastid PPR-E+ editosome is composed of PPR-E+, ZmDYW2A/2B, ZmNUWA, ZmMORF2/8/9, ZmORRM1, and ZmOZ1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.