Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38327702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2023

Endometrial DNA methylation signatures during the time of breeding in relation to the pregnancy outcome in postpartum dairy cows fed a control diet or supplemented with rumen-protected methionine.

Dessie Salilew-Wondim, Ernst Tholen, Eva Held-Hoelker, Karl Shellander, Carina Blaschka, Marc Drillich, Michael Iwersen, David Suess, Samuel Gebremedhn, Dawit Tesfaye and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Dessie Salilew-WondimDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ernst TholenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Eva Held-HoelkerInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Karl ShellanderDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Carina BlaschkaDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Marc DrillichClinical Unit for Herd Health Management, University Clinic for Ruminants, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael IwersenClinical Unit for Herd Health Management, University Clinic for Ruminants, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David SuessClinical Unit for Herd Health Management, University Clinic for Ruminants, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Samuel GebremedhnDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Dawit TesfayeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Claudia ParysEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau, Germany.
Ariane HelmbrechtEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau, Germany.
Jessie GuyaderEvonik Operations GmbH, Hanau, Germany.
Dennis MiskelInstitute of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nares TrakooljulResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.
Klaus WimmersResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.
Michael HoelkerDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Reproduction of Farm Animals, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post calving metabolic stress reduces the fertility of high producing dairy cows possibly by altering the expression of genes in the maternal environment via epigenetic modifications. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify endometrial DNA methylation marks that can be associated with pregnancy outcomes in postpartum cows at the time of breeding. For this, twelve days post-calving, cows were either offered a control diet or supplemented daily with rumen-protected methionine. Cows showing heat 50-64 days postpartum were artificially inseminated. Endometrial cytobrush samples were collected 4-8 h after artificial insemination and classified based on the pregnancy out comes as those derived from cows that resulted in pregnancy or resulted in no pregnancy. The DNAs isolated from endometrial samples were then subject to reduced representative bisulfite sequencing for DNA methylation analysis. Results showed that in the control diet group, 1,958 differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCGs) were identified between cows that resulted in pregnancy and those that resulted in no pregnancy of which 890 DMCGs were located on chr 27: 6217254-6225600 bp. A total of 537 DMCGs were overlapped with 313 annotated genes that were involved in various pathways including signal transduction, signalling by GPCR, aldosterone synthesis and secretion. Likewise, in methionine supplemented group, 3,430 CpG sites were differentially methylated between the two cow groups of which 18.7% were located on Chr27: 6217254-6225600 bp. A total of 1,781 DMCGS were overlapped with 890 genes which involved in developmental and signalling related pathways including WNT-signalling, focal adhesion and ECM receptor interaction. Interestingly, 149 genes involved in signal transduction, axon guidance and non-integrin membrane-ECM interactions were differentially methylated between the two cow groups irrespective of their feeding regime, while 453 genes involved in axon guidance, notch signalling and collagen formation were differentially methylated between cows that received rumen protected methionine and control diet irrespective of their fertility status. Overall, this study indicated that postpartum cows that could potentially become pregnant could be distinguishable based on their endometrial DNA methylation patterns at the time of breeding.

Indexed as

endometriummethioninemethylationpostpartumpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38327702
PMCPMC10847534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.