ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Comparative genomic analysis of uropathogenic
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genomic characterization of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strains identified from patients with urinary tract infection in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Population structure, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence factors of diabetic foot-associatedMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) that hides its identity: features of LC2 and EC73 strains from recurrent urinary tract infections.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- No Genomic Signatures Were Found inVeterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Pathogenesis and Immunomodulation of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Molecular Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Distribution of chaperone-usher fimbriae and curli fimbriae among uropathogenic Escherichia coli.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs) caused by uropathogenic Aim: In this work, a comparative genomics analysis of three clinical RUTI strains isolated from bladder biopsy specimens was performed. Materials and methods: One hundred seventy-two whole genomes of urinary tract Results: The UTI-1_774U and UTI-3_455U/ST1193 strains were associated with the extraintestinal pathotypes, and the UTI-2_245U/ST295 strain was associated with the intestinal pathotype, according to a phylogenetic analysis of 172 Conclusion: The high variability and genetic diversity of the RUTI strains indicate that are a mosaic of virulence, resistance, and fitness genes that could promote recurrence in susceptible patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.