Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38330461›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase Genomic Loss in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Natalie Y L Ngoi, Tin-Yun Tang, Catia F Gaspar, Dean C Pavlick, Gregory M Buchold, Emma L Scholefield, Vamsi Parimi, Richard S P Huang, Tyler Janovitz, Natalie Danziger and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genomics ofJCO precision oncology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prognostic Role ofJCO precision oncology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalie Y L NgoiDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-0715
Tin-Yun TangDivision of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2030-9518
Catia F GasparDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dean C PavlickFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-6246
Gregory M BucholdDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Emma L ScholefieldStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Vamsi ParimiFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tyler JanovitzFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Natalie DanzigerFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mia A LevyFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shubham PantDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Anaemy Danner De ArmasDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9614-8867
David KumpulaDepartments of Pathology, Urology and Medicine (Oncology), Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-2596
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9158-0941
Jordi Rodon AhnertDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6467-3632
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USFoundation Medicine (United States)SUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most common sporadic homozygous deletions in cancers is 9p21 loss, which includes the genes methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), CDKN2A, and CDKN2B, and has been correlated with worsened outcomes and immunotherapy resistance. MTAP-loss is a developing drug target through synthetic lethality with MAT2A and PMRT5 inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence and genomic landscape of MTAP-loss in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) tumors and investigate its role as a prognostic biomarker. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic and clinical analysis on an extensive cohort of 64 860 tumors comprising 5 GI cancers. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with GI cancer harboring MTAP-loss and MTAP-intact tumors in a retrospective study.

resultsThe prevalence of MTAP-loss in GI cancers is 8.30%. MTAP-loss was most prevalent in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at 21.7% and least in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) at 1.1%. MTAP-loss tumors were more prevalent in East Asian patients with PDAC (4.4% vs 3.2%, P = .005) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC; 6.4% vs 4.3%, P = .036). Significant differences in the prevalence of potentially targetable genomic alterations (ATM, BRAF, BRCA2, ERBB2, IDH1, PIK3CA, and PTEN) were observed in MTAP-loss tumors and varied according to tumor type. MTAP-loss PDAC, IHCC, and CRC had a lower prevalence of microsatellite instability or elevated tumor mutational burden. Positive PD-L1 tumor cell expression was less frequent among MTAP-loss versus MTAP-intact IHCC tumors (23.2% vs 31.2%, P = .017).

conclusionIn GI cancers, MTAP-loss occurs as part of 9p21 loss and has an overall prevalence of 8%. MTAP-loss occurs in 22% of PDAC, 15% of IHCC, 8.7% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, 2.4% of hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1.1% of CRC and is not mutually exclusive with other targetable mutations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsPurine-Nucleoside PhosphorylaseAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies5'-methylthioadenosine phosphorylaseBiomarkers, TumorMTAP protein, humanPurine-Nucleoside Phosphorylase9p21 lossbiomarkerscholangiocarcinomagenomicsMTAP losstumor

Identifiers

PMID38330461
PMCPMC11144995
OpenAlexW4391659120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.