ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
Potential Role of Bone Metabolism Markers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The immune duality of osteopontin and its therapeutic implications for kidney transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The Relationship between Sclerostin and Kidney Transplantation Mineral Bone Disorders: A Molecule of Controversies.Calcified tissue international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of treatments, suppressing the immune system, persistent hyperparathyroidism, and other risk factors on mineral and bone disorder (MBD) after kidney transplantation is well-known. However, there is limited knowledge about their effect on bone metabolism biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate the influence of kidney transplant on these markers, comparing them to patients undergoing hemodialysis and healthy individuals.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, three groups were included: kidney transplant patients (n = 57), hemodialysis patients (n = 26), and healthy controls (n = 31). Plasma concentrations of various bone metabolism biomarkers, including Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, sclerostin, and fibroblast growth factor 23, were measured. Associations between these biomarkers and clinical and laboratory data were evaluated.
resultsA total of 114 patients participated. Transplant recipients had significantly lower levels of Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, sclerostin, and fibroblast growth factor 23 compared to hemodialysis patients. Alkaline phosphatase levels positively correlated with osteopontin (r = 0.572,
conclusionKidney transplantation significantly improves mineral and bone disorders associated with end-stage kidney disease by modulating MBD markers and reducing bone metabolism markers, such as Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, and sclerostin. Moreover, the panel of bone biomarkers effectively predicted hypercalcemia and dyslipidemia in transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.