Molecular simulation approaches to probing the effects of mechanical forces in the actin cytoskeleton.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparison of Predicted X-Ray Fiber Diffraction Patterns from All-Atom and Coarse-Grained Actin Filament Models Under Nonuniform Strain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
   Article
2. A direct computational assessment of vinculin-actin unbinding kinetics reveals catch-bonding behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
   Article
3. Good Rates From Bad Coordinates: The Exponential Average Time-dependent Rate Approach.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
   Article
4. Quantifying Unbiased Conformational Ensembles from Biased Simulations Using ShapeGMM.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Update of
  Molecular simulation approaches to probing the effects of mechanical forces in the actin cytoskeleton.2023

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as