Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334629›Full record

SynthesisCells2024

A Systematic Review on Drugs Acting as Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists in the Treatment of Dementia.

Alessio Crestini, Elena Carbone, Roberto Rivabene, Antonio Ancidoni, Paolo Rosa, Ada Maria Tata, Elisa Fabrizi, Nicoletta Locuratolo, Nicola Vanacore, Eleonora Lacorte and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessio CrestiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0787-7799
Elena CarboneDepartment of Neuroscience, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2844-1073
Roberto RivabeneDepartment of Neuroscience, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3687-969X
Antonio AncidoniNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3949-3127
Paolo RosaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8468-0677
Ada Maria TataDepartment of Biology and Biotechnologies Charles Darwin, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4868-5435
Elisa FabriziNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Nicoletta LocuratoloNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2817-3758
Eleonora LacorteNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Paola PiscopoDepartment of Neuroscience, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0693-4969
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine signaling is attenuated in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias. A significant reduction in the expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the brain of AD patients has also been reported in several molecular biological and in situ labeling studies. The modulation of the functional deficit of the cholinergic system as a pharmacological target could therefore have a clinical benefit, which is not to be neglected. This systematic review was conducted to identify clinical trials, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists using Clinicaltrial (CT) and EudraCT databases. Structured searches identified 39 trials, which used 15 different drugs designed to increase the function of the nAChRs. Most of the identified clinical trials were phase II trials, with some of them classified as ongoing for several years. The systematic screening of the literature led to the selection of 14 studies out of the 8261 bibliographic records retrieved. Six trials reported detailed data on adverse events associated with the intervention, while twelve trials reported data on efficacy measures, such as attention, behavior and cognition. Overall, smost of the physical side effects of cholinergic agonists were reported to be well tolerated. Some trials also reported improvements in attention. However, the efficacy of these drugs in other cognitive and behavioral outcomes remains highly controversial.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseReceptors, NicotinicBrainCognitionHumansNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, NicotinicAlzheimer’s diseaseclinical trialsdementiadisease-modifying therapiesneurodegenerative diseasenicotinic acetylcholine receptornicotinic agonists

Identifiers

PMID38334629
PMCPMC10854606
OpenAlexW4391254380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.