Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339073›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Machine Learning Methods for Gene Selection in Uveal Melanoma.

Francesco Reggiani, Zeinab El Rashed, Mariangela Petito, Max Pfeffer, Anna Morabito, Enrica Teresa Tanda, Francesco Spagnolo, Michela Croce, Ulrich Pfeffer, Adriana Amaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesco ReggianiLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4144-4292
Zeinab El RashedLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Mariangela PetitoLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Max PfefferInstitute of Numerical and Applied Mathematics, University of Göttingen, 37083 Göttingen, Germany.
Anna MorabitoLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Enrica Teresa TandaSkin Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1552-9826
Francesco SpagnoloSkin Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Michela CroceBiotherapies, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-4951
Ulrich PfefferLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-4671
Adriana AmaroLaboratory of Gene Expression Regulation, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-7756

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 448293816Ministero della Salute 5X1000 2018/19Ministero della Salute Ricerca corrente 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy with a limited five-year survival for metastatic patients. Limited therapeutic treatments are currently available for metastatic disease, even if the genomics of this tumor has been deeply studied using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and functional experiments. The profound knowledge of the molecular features that characterize this tumor has not led to the development of efficacious therapies, and the survival of metastatic patients has not changed for decades. Several bioinformatics methods have been applied to mine NGS tumor data in order to unveil tumor biology and detect possible molecular targets for new therapies. Each application can be single domain based while others are more focused on data integration from multiple genomics domains (as gene expression and methylation data). Examples of single domain approaches include differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis on gene expression data with statistical methods such as SAM (significance analysis of microarray) or gene prioritization with complex algorithms such as deep learning. Data fusion or integration methods merge multiple domains of information to define new clusters of patients or to detect relevant genes, according to multiple NGS data. In this work, we compare different strategies to detect relevant genes for metastatic disease prediction in the TCGA uveal melanoma (UVM) dataset. Detected targets are validated with multi-gene score analysis on a larger UM microarray dataset.

Indexed as

MelanomaUveal NeoplasmsHumansMicroarray AnalysisUveal Melanomadata fusionmulti-domain datauveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID38339073
PMCPMC10855534

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.