ReviewCancers2024
Molecular Genetic Profile of Myelofibrosis: Implications in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Advancements.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- PD-1/PD-L1-CXCR3 Coexpression and CXCR3 on Intermediate Monocytes Predict Fibrosis, Leukemic Transformation, and Survival in Egyptian Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Severe tophaceous gout in the setting of myelofibrosis: A clinical challenge.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Review
- JAK2 46/1 (GGCC) Haplotype in Oncogenesis, as Risk Stratifier, and Indicator for Drug Resistance in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- IMOP-Cancer: identifying mutation order pairs impacting cancer phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Managing Myelofibrosis: Matching Advances in Treatments With Clinical Unmet Needs.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- Selinexor plus ruxolitinib in JAK inhibitor treatment-naïve myelofibrosis: SENTRY Phase 3 study design.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- The Molecular Pathology of Blood Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Chromosome and Genetic Abnormalities and Their Clinical Utility.British journal of biomedical science · 2025Review
- TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasms: implications for accurate laboratory detection, diagnosis, and treatment.Laboratory medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical features and treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with secondary myelofibrosis: a retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is an essential element of primary myelofibrosis, whereas secondary MF may develop in the advanced stages of other myeloid neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Over the last two decades, advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly the integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratories, have revolutionized the diagnosis, classification, and clinical decision making of myelofibrosis. Driver mutations involving
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.