Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38340090›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Network propagation for GWAS analysis: a practical guide to leveraging molecular networks for disease gene discovery.

Giovanni Visonà, Emmanuelle Bouzigon, Florence Demenais, Gabriele Schweikert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Network propagation in bipartite metabolite-reaction graphs for metabolomic data exploration.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanni VisonàEmpirical Inference, Max-Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7878-5448
Emmanuelle BouzigonUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM, UMRS-1124, Paris F-75006, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5756-4286
Florence DemenaisUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM, UMRS-1124, Paris F-75006, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-0936
Gabriele SchweikertSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-7918

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T022620/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have enabled large-scale analysis of the role of genetic variants in human disease. Despite impressive methodological advances, subsequent clinical interpretation and application remains challenging when GWAS suffer from a lack of statistical power. In recent years, however, the use of information diffusion algorithms with molecular networks has led to fruitful insights on disease genes.

resultsWe present an overview of the design choices and pitfalls that prove crucial in the application of network propagation methods to GWAS summary statistics. We highlight general trends from the literature, and present benchmark experiments to expand on these insights selecting as case study three diseases and five molecular networks. We verify that the use of gene-level scores based on GWAS P-values offers advantages over the selection of a set of 'seed' disease genes not weighted by the associated P-values if the GWAS summary statistics are of sufficient quality. Beyond that, the size and the density of the networks prove to be important factors for consideration. Finally, we explore several ensemble methods and show that combining multiple networks may improve the network propagation approach.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansdisease geneGWASmolecular networknetwork propagation

Identifiers

PMID38340090
PMCPMC10858647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.