Evidence mapPaperPMID 38343370Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap versus standard angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomised, multicentre DCR4Contrast trial.

Breda Hennessey, Haim Danenberg, Frédéric De Vroey, Ajay J Kirtane, Manish Parikh, Dimitrios Karmpaliotis, John C Messenger, Aaron Strobel, Alejandro Curcio, Martijn S van Mourik and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04085614 (Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04085614 nacompletednot on this map

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilips Clinical & Medical Affairs GlobalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled371ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with Dynamic Coronary Roadmap, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) without Dynamic Coronary Roadmap
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Real-World Evaluation of PCI Guidance Using Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: A DCR4Contrast Trial Secondary Analysis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  11. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Breda HennesseyHospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Haim DanenbergHeart Institute, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Frédéric De VroeyDepartment of Cardiology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Ajay J KirtaneDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Manish ParikhDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Dimitrios KarmpaliotisDivision of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
John C MessengerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Aaron StrobelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alejandro CurcioDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Martijn S van MourikPhilips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands.
Peter EshuisPhilips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands.
Javier EscanedHospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Philips (Netherlands) · NLGrand Charleroi Hospital · BEHadassah Medical Center · ILHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecreasing the amount of iodinated contrast is an important safety aspect of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with a high risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Dynamic Coronary Roadmap (DCR) is a PCI navigation support tool projecting a motion-compensated virtual coronary roadmap overlay on fluoroscopy, potentially limiting the need for contrast during PCI.

aimsThis study investigates the contrast-sparing potential of DCR in PCI, compared to standard angiographic guidance.

methodsThe Dynamic Coronary Roadmap for Contrast Reduction (DCR4Contrast) trial is a multicentre, international, prospective, unblinded, stratified 1:1 randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to either DCR-guided PCI or to conventional angiography-guided PCI. The primary endpoint was the total volume of iodinated contrast administered, and the secondary endpoint was the number of cineangiography runs during PCI.

resultsThe study population included 356 randomised patients (179 in DCR and 177 in control groups, respectively). There were no differences in patient demographics, angiographic characteristics or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups. The total contrast volume used during PCI was significantly lower with DCR guidance compared with conventional angiographic guidance (64.6±44.4 ml vs 90.8±55.4 ml, respectively; p<0.001). The total number of cineangiography runs was also significantly reduced in the DCR group (8.7±4.7 vs 11.7±7.6 in the control group; p<0.001).

conclusionsCompared to conventional angiography-guided PCI, DCR guidance was associated with a significant reduction in both contrast volume and the number of cineangiography runs during PCI. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04085614).

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID38343370
PMCPMC10851082
OpenAlexW4391471028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.