Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344008›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2024

Perceptual integration of bodily and facial emotion cues in chimpanzees and humans.

Raphaela Heesen, Yena Kim, Mariska E Kret, Zanna Clay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raphaela HeesenDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-1660
Yena KimInstitute of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden 2333 AK, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-2226
Mariska E KretInstitute of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden 2333 AK, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-5084
Zanna ClayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3016-1732
Leiden University · NLDurham University · GBUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For highly visual species like primates, facial and bodily emotion expressions play a crucial role in emotion perception. However, most research focuses on facial expressions, while the perception of bodily cues is still poorly understood. Using a novel comparative priming eye-tracking design, we examined whether our close primate relatives, the chimpanzees (

Indexed as

attentioncommunicationemotional body languageeye-trackingperception

Identifiers

PMID38344008
PMCPMC10855020
OpenAlexW4391052622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.