ArticleCureus2024
Blood Donation Practices and Awareness of Blood Types Among Adults in the United Arab Emirates: A Cross-Sectional Community-Based Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Blood donation serves as a crucial component of healthcare systems worldwide, ensuring the availability of blood for life-saving therapies and medical procedures. To date, no studies have assessed the knowledge of blood donors regarding their own blood type, overall awareness of blood types, and blood donation practices within the United Arab Emirates (UAE) population. Aim The present study's primary objective is to assess knowledge regarding blood types and blood donation practices among adult blood donors in the UAE. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of existing initiatives and propose targeted strategies to recruit new donors and retain existing ones, with a specific emphasis on less common or critical blood types like O-negative. Methods This cross-sectional community-based study involved 259 participants selected through convenience sampling. Interviews were conducted at blood donation sites, and blood type data for each participant was collected from the blood bank following their donation. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), and p-values of <0.05 were considered and reported as statistically significant. Results Blood type distribution showed a prevalence of O+ (41.7%), A+ (22.4%), and B+ (19.7%). Notably, the rarest blood types observed were O- (2.3%) and AB- (0.4%). First-time blood donors comprised 29.7%, while the rest had previously donated blood at least once. About 72.2% of participants identified their blood type correctly, but knowledge regarding the concept of blood compatibility was limited. Emirati nationality, higher education level, and a history of previous blood donations were significantly associated with blood type awareness. Perceived accessibility to blood donation was generally high. The most reported motivational drives for blood donation included awareness of blood donation significance, a sense of ethical duty, and religious beliefs. Conclusion Most participants correctly identified their blood type; awareness was associated with Emirati nationality, higher educational achievement, and a history of previous blood donation. The high perceived accessibility of blood donation, coupled with the observed prevalence of previous blood donations among participants, offers valuable feedback on the current initiatives in the UAE for blood donation. Our study identifies target demographics and motivational triggers, offering valuable insights for optimizing blood donation initiatives in the UAE. These findings provide a strategic foundation for enhancing awareness and participation in this vital healthcare domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.