ArticleCureus2024
Psychological Impact and Quality of Life in Adults With Tinnitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Epidemiological Determinants of Tinnitus in the Southern Region of Saudi Arabia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Association between hypertension status and severity and tinnitus: a cross-sectional analysis of the Fasa adult cohort study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Identify and Predict High-Distress Psychosocial Phenotypes in Tinnitus Patients: A Latent Profile Analysis.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in alleviation of tinnitus in normal hearing subjects.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Review
- Optimization of utilizing the HHIE-S for hearing screening in older people: a cross-sectional study of associated factors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tinnitus and Its Comorbidities: A Comprehensive Analysis of Their Relationships.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Tinnitus Prevalence, Associated Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns among Adults in Saudi Arabia.Audiology research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTinnitus may directly or indirectly influence professional, personal, and leisure activities and disrupt family and social relationships in severe cases. This study aimed to explore the impact of tinnitus on the quality of life (QoL) and psychological well-being among Saudi Arabian adults.
methodsThis study used a cross-sectional design to collect data from adults experiencing tinnitus. Data collection took place between September 5, 2023 and October 7, 2023 at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. The study involved adults aged 18 to 65 with tinnitus. Participants were recruited from audiology clinics. A multi-stage stratified random sampling method was used to recruit the study participants. The severity of tinnitus handicap was assessed using the 25-item Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire. THI consists of 25 items divided into functional, emotional, and catastrophic subscales. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater tinnitus-related handicap. THI scores are categorized into 0-16, 18-36, 38-56, 58-76, and 78-100.
resultsA total of 163 participants were included in this study. The largest age group category was 18-29 years, comprising 57.05% (n = 93) of the sample. The study included a slightly higher percentage of female participants (65.03%, n = 106). More than three-fifths (61.96% ) of the participants were from the Western Region (n = 101), 91.40% (n = 149) were Saudi nationals, 55.21% (n = 90) were single, 67.5% (n = 110) had university education, 46.0% (n = 75) had income less than 500 SAR, 44.78% (n =73) was employed, and 74.23% (n = 121) did not smoke. Tinnitus hurts emotions and QoL. The largest proportion of the studied patients with tinnitus faced catastrophic handicaps (24.5%, n = 40), and nearly equal proportions experienced mild and moderate handicaps (23.3%, n = 38 and 23.9%, n =39, respectively). Severe handicap was reported in 15.3% (n = 25), while a slight effect was reported in (12.9%, n = 21). Tinnitus affected their hearing (36.81%, n = 60); interfered with daily life (33.74%, n = 55), social activities (30.06%, n = 49), social relationships (29.45%, n = 48), and concentration (37.42%, n = 61); caused fatigue (38.04%, n = 62) and sleep disturbances (36.81%, n = 60); and prevented them from enjoying life (25.77%, n = 42). Tinnitus caused anger (47.85%, n = 78), confusion (42.94%, n = 70), anxiety (43.56%, n = 71), feeling unsafe (33.74%, n = 55), desperation (36.81%, n = 60), frustration (30.06%, n = 49), being upset (38.04%, n = 62), experiencing depression (30.67%), and challenges in coping with stress (31.29%). There was a significant association between the THI score and region of residence (p = 0.02), income (p = 0.041), occupation (p = 0.013), and smoking (p = 0.014).
conclusionsOur research underscored the profound impact of tinnitus on the QoL among adults in Saudi Arabia. A significant portion of the studied patients faced catastrophic handicaps, emphasizing the severity of the condition. These findings underscore the multifaceted and far-reaching consequences of tinnitus, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and management strategies tailored to the unique sociodemographic factors influencing individuals' experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.