ReviewCureus2024
Prehospital Fibrinolysis Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy and Adverse Reactions among Various Thrombolytic Agents.Toxics · 2024Article
- Maggot Kinase and Natural Thrombolytic Proteins.ACS omega · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction is a fatal condition. Acute myocardial infarction requires appropriate timely reperfusion therapy to improve the outcomes. Fibrinolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention are the cornerstone strategies for managing such cases. In this review, our objective is to summarize the available evidence concerning the administration of prehospital fibrinolysis and its impact on patient outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Our search strategy included the following terms: "Prehospital," "EMS," "Emergency Medical Services," "ambulance," "Fibrinolytic Therapy," "alteplase," "streptokinase," "reteplase," "tenecteplase," "Acute Myocardial Infarction," and "patient outcomes." We found prehospital administration of fibrinolysis may improve the outcomes and decrease the mortality rate. We found that some recommendations were to use prehospital fibrinolysis only if the percutaneous coronary intervention was not accessible within two hours. Additionally, we discussed recommendations to use newer prehospital fibrinolysis as they have better efficacy and safety outcomes. In conclusion, prehospital fibrinolysis decreases the total ischemic time and improves outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients when timely percutaneous coronary intervention is not available. The guidelines strongly recommend it when the anticipated time for percutaneous coronary intervention exceeds two hours. Ongoing research optimizes patient selection, treatment tools, and prehospital systems of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.