ArticleCirculation2024
The Macrophage Landscape Across the Lifespan of a Human Cardiac Allograft.
Article in Circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Nucleus Transcriptomic Atlas of Human Vellus Hair Pilosebaceous Units Reveals Age-Associated Remodeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Activation of developmental transcription factors using RNA technology promotes heart repair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Insights into the history and tendency of cardiac transplantation for heart failure: A bibliometric-based visual analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Decoding immune cell interactions during cardiac allograft vasculopathy: insights derived from bioinformatic strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMuch of our knowledge of organ rejection after transplantation is derived from rodent models.
methodsWe used single-nucleus RNA sequencing to investigate the inflammatory myocardial microenvironment in human pediatric cardiac allografts at different stages after transplantation. We distinguished donor- from recipient-derived cells using naturally occurring genetic variants embedded in single-nucleus RNA sequencing data.
resultsDonor-derived tissue resident macrophages, which accompany the allograft into the recipient, are lost over time after transplantation. In contrast, monocyte-derived macrophages from the recipient populate the heart within days after transplantation and form 2 macrophage populations: recipient MP1 and recipient MP2. Recipient MP2s have cell signatures similar to donor-derived resident macrophages; however, they lack signatures of pro-reparative phagocytic activity typical of donor-derived resident macrophages and instead express profibrotic genes. In contrast, recipient MP1s express genes consistent with hallmarks of cellular rejection. Our data suggest that recipient MP1s activate a subset of natural killer cells, turning them into a cytotoxic cell population through feed-forward signaling between recipient MP1s and natural killer cells.
conclusionsOur findings reveal an imbalance of donor-derived and recipient-derived macrophages in the pediatric cardiac allograft that contributes to allograft failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.