Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345183›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2024

Unlocking the potential of bacterial endophytes from medicinal plants for drug discovery.

Sergey B Zotchev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant-Endophyte Cross-Talk inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of microbial diversity inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genomes and secondary metabolomes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Insights on mining the pangenome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sergey B ZotchevDivision of Pharmacognosy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-245X

Funding

Universität Wien
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the plant-associated microorganisms, the so-called endophytes continue to attract much attention because of their ability not only to protect host plants from biotic and abiotic stress factors, but also the potential to produce bioactive secondary metabolites. The latter property can elicit growth-promoting effects on plants, as well as boost the production of plant-specific secondary metabolites with valuable pharmacological properties. In addition, endophyte-derived secondary metabolites may be a rich source for the discovery of drugs to treat various diseases, including infections and cancer. However, the full potential of endophytes to produce bioactive secondary metabolites is often not revealed upon conventional cultivation in the laboratory. New advances in genomics and metabolic engineering offer exciting opportunities for the exploration and exploitation of endophytes' biosynthetic potential. This review focuses on bacterial endophytes of medicinal plants, some of their secondary metabolites and recent advances in deciphering their biosynthesis. The latter may assist in genetic engineering efforts aimed at the discovery of novel bioactive compounds with the potential to be developed into drugs.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalBacteriaDrug DiscoveryEndophytes

Identifiers

PMID38345183
PMCPMC10884874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.