ReviewCell regeneration (London, England)2024
Reevaluating Golgi fragmentation and its implications in wound repair.
Review in Cell regeneration (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cx43 levels guide apicobasal polarity in regenerating airway epithelial cells.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Organelle homeostasis disruption: A driving force in the progression of cardiomyopathy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
- Ythdc1-p300-Klf5 Complex-Mediated Golgi Dysfunction Promotes Aortic Aneurysm.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Future Prospects in Biological-Membrane-Targeted Polymers.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Golgi-restored vesicular replenishment retards bone aging and empowers aging bone regeneration.Bone research · 2025Article
- The role of Golgi complex proteins in cell division and consequences of their dysregulation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Golgi Apparatus (GA) is pivotal in vesicle sorting and protein modifications within cells. Traditionally, the GA has been described as a perinuclear organelle consisting of stacked cisternae forming a ribbon-like structure. Changes in the stacked structure or the canonical perinuclear localization of the GA have been referred to as "GA fragmentation", a term widely employed in the literature to describe changes in GA morphology and distribution. However, the precise meaning and function of GA fragmentation remain intricate. This review aims to demystify this enigmatic phenomenon, dissecting the diverse morphological changes observed and their potential contributions to cellular wound repair and regeneration. Through a comprehensive analysis of current research, we hope to pave the way for future advancements in GA research and their important role in physiological and pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.