Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351990›Full record

ArticleJTCVS techniques2024

Surgically implanted endovascular, microaxial left ventricular assist device: A single institution study.

Erin M Schumer, Yun Zhu Bai, Kunal D Kotkar, M Faraz Masood, Akinobu Itoh, Joel D Schilling, Gregory A Ewald, Marci S Damiano, Irene Fischer, Tsuyoshi Kaneko and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin M SchumerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Yun Zhu BaiDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Kunal D KotkarDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
M Faraz MasoodDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Akinobu ItohDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Joel D SchillingDivision of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Gregory A EwaldDivision of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Marci S DamianoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Irene FischerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Tsuyoshi KanekoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Ralph J DamianoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Amit PawaleDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Washington University in St. Louis · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

PRINCIPLES IN PULMONARY RESEARCHT32HL007317 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Steven Brody, Michael J Holtzman · 1985 to 2026
$16.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Inc), a surgically implanted endovascular microaxial left ventricular assist device, is increasingly used worldwide and there have been more than 10,000 implants. The purpose of this study is to describe a large-volume, single-center experience with the use of the Impella 5.5. Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from patients supported with the Impella 5.5 implanted at our institution from May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes for each group are described. Results are reported in median (interquartile range) or n (%). The entire cohort was divided into 5 main groups based on the intention to treat at the time of the Impella 5.5 implantation: (1) patients who had a planned Impella 5.5 implanted at the time of high-risk cardiac surgery; (2) patients with cardiogenic shock; (3) patients bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device; (4) patients bridged to transplant; and (5) patients with postcardiotomy shock who received an unplanned Impella 5.5 implant. Results: A total of 126 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5. Overall survival to device explant was 76.2%, with 67.5% surviving to discharge. Midterm survival was assessed with a median follow-up time of 318 days and demonstrated an overall survival of 60.3% and a median of 650 days (549-752). Conclusions: Outcomes after using the Impella 5.5 are variable depending on the indication of use. Patient selection may be of utmost importance and requires further experience with this device to determine who will benefit from insertion.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shocktemporary mechanical circulatory supportventricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID38351990
PMCPMC10859563
OpenAlexW4387824732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.