Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355539›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.

Engin Turkay Yilmaz, Ibrahim Mehmet Goymen, Melih Oral, Ozan Tuncay, Gokay Dursun, Egemen Turhan, Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Engin Turkay YilmazOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-3505
Ibrahim Mehmet GoymenOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey. mehmetgymn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7552-286X
Melih OralOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3800-9903
Ozan TuncayOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9040-2350
Gokay DursunOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-6929
Egemen TurhanOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-704X
Ahmet Mazhar TokgozogluOrthopedics and Traumatology Department, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-8115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatment options for patellofemoral (PF) instability have required functional scoring systems. The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) scores were explicitly created to meet the need to evaluate PF instability. Different patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are used to evaluate anterior knee problems.

objectivesTo test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsFifty-one patients that operated for PF instability, older than eighteen years old, were included in this study. Turkish translation of the BPII 2.0 and NPI scores was undertaken through translation into Turkish by an independent translator. Two tests were repeated seven days apart. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by correlating the Kujala and Lysholm knee scores.

resultsFifty-one patients (34 females/17 males), the average age was 25 ± 7, were included in this study. Cronbach's alpha value was 0.829 for BPII 2.0 and 0.843 for NPI for the first time answered by patients. ICC values applied to evaluate test-retest reliability were 0.904 (p < 0.05) for BPII 2.0 and 0.915 (p < 0.05) for NPI. There was a moderate correlation between the BPII 2.0 Turkish version and the Kujala score. There was a very high correlation between the Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and Lysholm knee scores. An excellent negative correlation was found between Norwich and Kujala scores (r = -0.819, p < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between Norwich and Lysholm scores was -0.662, indicating a high negative correlation (p < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the Turkish version of BPII 2.0 and NPI were -0.533 (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe Turkish version of the BPII 2.0 and NPI score is a reliable and valid instrument for Turkish-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityPatellofemoral JointAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38355539
PMCPMC10865514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.