ArticleNature communications2024
Natural selection and genetic diversity maintenance in a parasitic wasp during continuous biological control application.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective Breeding and Trait Improvement of Insect Natural Enemies for Ecologically Robust Biological Control.Insects · 2026Review
- Evaluation ofInsects · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Molecular Identification ofInsects · 2026Article
- Effects of symbiotic bacteria on the parasitism efficacy ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Using Genomic Data to Infer Evolutionary Processes in the Asexual ParasitoidEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Fascination with RNA Editing: In the Lights of Evolution and Biology.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Selection ofInsects · 2025Article
- A case of polyploid utility in biocontrol: reproductively-impaired triploid Nasonia vitripennis have high host-killing ability.Pest management science · 2025Article
- Extreme genetic signatures of local adaptation in a notorious rice pest,National science review · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insectEpigenetics · 2024Article
- Comparative genomic analyses on assassin bugiScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aphidius gifuensis is a parasitoid wasp and primary endoparasitoid enemy of the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Artificially reared, captive wasps of this species have been extensively and effectively used to control populations of aphids and limit crop loss. However, the consequences of large-scale releasing of captive A. gifuensis, such as genetic erosion and reduced fitness in wild populations of this species, remains unclear. Here, we sequence the genomes of 542 A. gifuensis individuals collected across China, including 265 wild and 277 human-intervened samples. Population genetic analyses on wild individuals recovered Yunnan populations as the ancestral group with the most complex genetic structure. We also find genetic signature of environmental adaptation during the dispersal of wild populations from Yunnan to other regions. While comparative genomic analyses of captive wasps revealed a decrease in genetic diversity during long-term rearing, population genomic analyses revealed signatures of natural selection by several biotic (host plants) or abiotic (climate) factors, which support maintenance of the gene pool of wild populations in spite of the introduction of captive wasps. Therefore, the impact of large-scale release is reduced. Our study suggests that A. gifuensis is a good system for exploring the genetic and evolutionary effects of mass rearing and release on species commonly used as biocontrol agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.