Evidence mapPaperPMID 38356019Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Home-based exercise interventions' impact on breast cancer survivors' functional performance: a systematic review.

Pedro G F Ramos, Pedro B Júdice, Inês Nobre, Eliana V Carraça

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06429189 (An Online Home-based Combined Exercise Intervention With Self-selected Intensity for Women With Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06429189 naunknown statusnot on this map

An Online Home-based Combined Exercise Intervention With Self-selected Intensity for Women With Breast Cancer: The Home-Combo Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrupo LusófonaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled98ConditionsBreast Cancer, Chemotherapy EffectArmsHome-based combined exercise program with self-selected intensity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro G F RamosUniversidade Lusófona, Campo Grande 376, Lisboa, 1749-024, Portugal.
Pedro B JúdiceCentro de Investigação em Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde (CIDEFES), Universidade Lusófona, Campo Grande 376, Desporto, Lisboa, 1749-024, Portugal.
Inês NobreCentro Interdisciplinar de Performance Humana (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Estrada Costa Cruz Quebrada, Cruz Quebrada-Dafundo, 1495-688, Portugal.
Eliana V CarraçaCentro de Investigação em Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde (CIDEFES), Universidade Lusófona, Campo Grande 376, Desporto, Lisboa, 1749-024, Portugal. p4890@ulusofona.pt.
Universidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHome-based exercise (HBE) programs can be a feasible strategy to enhance functional performance and promote physical activity (PA) in breast cancer survivors. A deeper analysis of the effects of HBE interventions, structured by HBE program type and treatment phase, is needed. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on HBE interventions' impact on breast cancer survivors' functional performance, PA levels, and program adherence rates, according to HBE intervention type and treatment phase.

methodsA comprehensive search of peer-reviewed articles reporting HBE interventions' effects on the outcomes of interest was performed in Pubmed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Web of Science, Science Direct, and B-ON until January 15th, 2024. Data were synthesized according to Denton's domains to classify HBE interventions (prescription: structured vs. unstructured; Delivery method: supervised vs. facilitated vs. unsupervised) and treatment phase. Methodological quality appraisal was performed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool.

resultsTwenty-six studies were included. Most studies conducted structured/facilitated interventions and reported positive effects on functional performance (particularly aerobic capacity), increases in PA levels, and high adherence rates (> 70%) during and post-treatment.

conclusionHBE interventions may be feasible to improve functional performance and promote physical activity among breast cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to confirm which HBE intervention type is more appropriate for each treatment phase. More evidence applying HBE interventions with different designs is required to allow the drawing of more solid conclusions. Studies exploring the effects of HBE interventions on the pre-treatment phase are needed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsExerciseExercise TherapyHome Care ServicesFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID38356019
PMCPMC12283810
OpenAlexW4391841908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.