ArticleRSC advances2024
Use of Raman spectroscopy to study rat lung tissues for distinguishing asphyxia from sudden cardiac death.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fumarate hydratase downregulation in myocardial tissue: a potential biomarker for death from mechanical asphyxia.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Combined machine learning identification and experimental validation of NDUFS8 and SUCLG1 as potential biomarkers for mechanical asphyxia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining asphyxia as the cause of death is crucial but is based on an exclusive strategy because it lacks sensitive and specific morphological characteristics in forensic practice. In some cases where the deceased has underlying heart disease, differentiation between asphyxia and sudden cardiac death (SCD) as the primary cause of death can be challenging. Herein, Raman spectroscopy was employed to detect pulmonary biochemical differences to discriminate asphyxia from SCD in rat models. Thirty-two rats were used to build asphyxia and SCD models, with lung samples collected immediately or 24 h after death. Twenty Raman spectra were collected for each lung sample, and 640 spectra were obtained for further data preprocessing and analysis. The results showed that different biochemical alterations existed in the lung tissues of the rats that died from asphyxia and SCD and could be used to distinguish between the two causes of death. Moreover, we screened and used 8 of the 11 main differential spectral features that maintained their significant differences at 24 h after death to successfully determine the cause of death, even with decomposition and autolysis. Eventually, seven prevalent machine learning classification algorithms were employed to establish classification models, among which the support vector machine exhibited the best performance, with an area under the curve value of 0.9851 in external validation. This study shows the promise of Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms to investigate differential biochemical alterations originating from different deaths to aid determining the cause of death in forensic practice.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.