Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38357385›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2024

Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management.

Carlos Bilreiro, Luísa Andrade, Inês Santiago, Rui Mateus Marques, Celso Matos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Pancreatic protocol CT awareness.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. From Routine Imaging to Risk Stratification: Multimodal Vision-Language Survival Modeling for Pancreatic Cancer.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlos BilreiroRadiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Luísa AndradeRadiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês SantiagoRadiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui Mateus MarquesNova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Celso MatosRadiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning. Review aims and findings: This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested. Conclusion: Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant therapyNeoplasm recurrence, LocalNeoplasm stagingPancreatic carcinomaPatient care team

Identifiers

PMID38357385
PMCPMC10864763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.