Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358074›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

No-reflow after stroke reperfusion therapy: An emerging phenomenon to be explored.

Milan Jia, Feiyang Jin, Sijie Li, Changhong Ren, Mangal Ruchi, Yuchuan Ding, Wenbo Zhao, Xunming Ji

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Milan JiaDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-5302
Feiyang JinDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sijie LiDepartment of Emergency, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Changhong RenBeijing Key Laboratory of Hypoxic Conditioning Translational Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mangal RuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Yuchuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5358-1660
Wenbo ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xunming JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0293-2744
Capital Medical University · CNWayne State University · US

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation JQ22020Beijing Nova Program Z201100006820143National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801313National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971114National Natural Science Foundation of China 82001257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of stroke thrombectomy, ineffective clinical and angiographic reperfusion after successful recanalization has drawn attention. Partial or complete microcirculatory reperfusion failure after the achievement of full patency of a former obstructed large vessel, known as the "no-reflow phenomenon" or "microvascular obstruction," was first reported in the 1960s and was later detected in both experimental models and patients with stroke. The no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) was reported to result from intraluminal occlusions formed by blood components and extraluminal constriction exerted by the surrounding structures of the vessel wall. More recently, an emerging number of clinical studies have estimated the prevalence of the NRP in stroke patients following reperfusion therapy, ranging from 3.3% to 63% depending on its evaluation methods or study population. Studies also demonstrated its detrimental effects on infarction progress and neurological outcomes. In this review, we discuss the research advances, underlying pathogenesis, diagnostic techniques, and management approaches concerning the no-reflow phenomenon in the stroke population to provide a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon and offer references for future investigations.

Indexed as

No-Reflow PhenomenonStrokeHumansMicrocirculationReperfusionThrombectomyTreatment Outcomeacute ischemic strokeendovascular thrombectomymicrovascular disturbanceno-reflow phenomenonreperfusion therapy

Identifiers

PMID38358074
PMCPMC10867879
OpenAlexW4391850457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.