Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360805›Full record

ArticleResearch integrity and peer review2024

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science.

Priya Silverstein, Colin Elman, Amanda Montoya, Barbara McGillivray, Charlotte R Pennington, Chase H Harrison, Crystal N Steltenpohl, Jan Philipp Röer, Katherine S Corker, Lisa M Charron and 29 more

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research integrity and peer review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Priya SilversteinDepartment of Psychology, Ashland University, Ashland, USA. psilver2@ashland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-339X
Colin ElmanMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-4640
Amanda MontoyaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-8184
Barbara McGillivrayDepartment of Digital Humanities, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3426-8200
Charlotte R PenningtonSchool of Psychology, College of Health & Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-642X
Chase H HarrisonDepartment of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1849-7397
Crystal N SteltenpohlDartmouth Center for Program Design and Evaluation, Hanover, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-9354
Jan Philipp RöerDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-3433
Katherine S CorkerDepartment of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-1678
Lisa M CharronAmerican Family Insurance Data Science Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-9695
Mahmoud ElsherifDepartment of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-3998
Mario MalickiMeta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-1930
Rachel Hayes-HarbDepartment of Linguistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3115-6289
Sandra GrinschglDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6666-9426
Tess NealDepartment of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-8638
Thomas Rhys EvansSchool of Human Sciences and Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6670-0718
Veli-Matti KarhulahtiDepartment of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3709-5341
William L D KrenzerOffice of Scientific Integrity, Duke University, Durham, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-9698
Anabel BelausNational Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9657-8496
David MoreauSchool of Psychology and Centre for Brain Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1957-1941
Debora I BurinFacultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-719X
Elizabeth ChinArtCenter College of Design, Pasadena, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8486-6562
Esther PlompFaculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-1357
Evan Mayo-WilsonDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-2459
Jared LyleInter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-7612
Jonathan M AdlerOlin College of Engineering, Needham, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-2116
Julia G BottesiniMaxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-993X
Katherine M LawsonDepartment of Psychology, Rhodes College, Memphis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-9797
Kathleen SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Ashland University, Ashland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9946-5953
Kyrani ReneauInter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-3689
Lars VilhuberEconomics Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-8932
Ludo WaltmanCentre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-1752
Morton Ann GernsbacherDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0397-3329
Paul E PlonskiDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-6020
Sakshi GhaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-0273
Sean GrantHEDCO Institute for Evidence-Based Practice, College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-3022
Thu-Mai ChristianOdum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-9692
William NgiamInstitute of Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-3881
Moin SyedDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-3555

Funding

National Science Foundation 2032661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Journal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online community for social science journal editors: www.dpjedi.org ) has collated several resources on embedding open science in journal editing ( www.dpjedi.org/resources ). However, it can be overwhelming as an editor new to open science practices to know where to start. For this reason, we created a guide for journal editors on how to get started with open science. The guide outlines steps that editors can take to implement open policies and practices within their journal, and goes through the what, why, how, and worries of each policy and practice. This manuscript introduces and summarizes the guide (full guide: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hstcx ).

Indexed as

Journal editingOpen sciencePeer reviewScholarly publishing

Identifiers

PMID38360805
PMCPMC10870631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.