Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362255›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2024

Effect of cryoanesthesia and sweet tasting solution in reducing injection pain in pediatric patients aged 7-10 years: a randomized controlled trial.

Shital Kiran Davangere Padmanabh, Vishakha Bhausaheb Gangurde, Vikram Jhamb, Nasrin Gori

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of cryoanaesthesia on pain during intraoral anaesthetic puncture in children: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shital Kiran Davangere PadmanabhDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, At. Amargadh, Tal. Sihor, Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2896-8446
Vishakha Bhausaheb GangurdeDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, At. Amargadh, Tal. Sihor, Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1626-2924
Vikram JhambDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, At. Amargadh, Tal. Sihor, Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-215X
Nasrin GoriDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, At. Amargadh, Tal. Sihor, Dist. Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0370-7965
Bhavnagar University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The delivery of profound local anesthetics helps children receive successful treatment by reducing fear, anxiety, and discomfort during dental procedures. Local anesthetic injections are the most anticipated stimuli in dental surgery. Children's perceptions of pain can be altered by applying cryotherapy to precool the oral mucosa or by diverting their minds through taste distractions before administering local anesthetic injections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cryoanesthesia and xylitol sweet-tasting solution at the injection site in 7-10-year-old children. Methods: A total of 42 participants, aged 7-10 years, who underwent dental treatment requiring local anesthesia, were enrolled in the study. The children were randomly divided into three groups. In group I, sterile water was held in the mouth for 2 minutes before anesthetic administration, similar to group II, and in group III, a xylitol sweet-tasting solution was used for 2 minutes before needle insertion. The analysis of pain perception was carried out based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Sound, Eyes, and Motor (SEM) scale. For VAS analysis, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for intergroup comparison, and a post hoc Tukey test was performed for subgroup analysis. For the categorical SEM scale, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the post hoc test was performed for intergroup comparison. Where a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence intervals. Results: Cryoanesthesia significantly reduced pain scores on VAS (4.21 ± 1.42) when compared to those on VAS with xylitol sweet-tasting solution (5.50 ± 1.40) and that with sterile water (6.14 ± 2.47). Intergroup comparison of the VAS scores among the three groups was performed using one-way ANOVA, which demonstrated statistically significant differences (P value <0.026) on the VAS scale. Intergroup comparison of the SEM scale was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by post hoc comparison, which exhibited statistically significant differences (P < 0.007) among the three groups for the SEM scale. Conclusion: Cryoanesthesia demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing injection pain than that exhibited by the xylitol sweet-tasting solution.

Indexed as

CryotherapyPain PerceptionVisual Analog ScaleXylitol

Identifiers

PMID38362255
PMCPMC10864708
OpenAlexW4392734547

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.