Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366575›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Chromosome-level assembly of the gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) confirms the basal loss of PRDM9 in Canidae.

Ellie E Armstrong, Ky L Bissell, H Sophia Fatima, Maya A Heikkinen, Anika Jessup, Maryam O Junaid, Dong H Lee, Emily C Lieb, Josef T Liem, Estelle M Martin and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ellie E ArmstrongSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-6318
Ky L BissellDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
H Sophia FatimaDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Maya A HeikkinenDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Anika JessupDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Maryam O JunaidDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Dong H LeeDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Emily C LiebDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Josef T LiemDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Estelle M MartinDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Mauricio MorenoDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Khuslen OtgonbayarDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Betsy W RomansDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Kim RoyarVermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, Montpelier, VT 05620, USA.
Mary Beth AdlerVermont Department of Fish and Wildlife, Montpelier, VT 05620, USA.
David B NeedleDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Biomedical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA.
Alex HarkessHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2035-0871
Joanna L KelleySchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-605X
Jazlyn A MooneyDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2369-0855
Alexis M MychajliwDepartment of Biology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA.
Middlebury College · USVermont Fish & Wildlife Department · USHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Southern California · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Washington Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference genome assemblies have been created from multiple lineages within the Canidae family; however, despite its phylogenetic relevance as a basal genus within the clade, there is currently no reference genome for the gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus). Here, we present a chromosome-level assembly for the gray fox (U. cinereoargenteus), which represents the most contiguous, non-domestic canid reference genome available to date, with 90% of the genome contained in just 34 scaffolds and a contig N50 and scaffold N50 of 59.4 and 72.9 Megabases, respectively. Repeat analyses identified an increased number of simple repeats relative to other canids. Based on mitochondrial DNA, our Vermont sample clusters with other gray fox samples from the northeastern United States and contains slightly lower levels of heterozygosity than gray foxes on the west coast of California. This new assembly lays the groundwork for future studies to describe past and present population dynamics, including the delineation of evolutionarily significant units of management relevance. Importantly, the phylogenetic position of Urocyon allows us to verify the loss of PRDM9 functionality in the basal canid lineage, confirming that pseudogenization occurred at least 10 million years ago.

Indexed as

ChromosomesFoxesAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialGenomePhylogenyDNA, MitochondrialCanidaegray foxheterozygosityPRDM9

Identifiers

PMID38366575
PMCPMC10989890
OpenAlexW4391898101

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.