ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Delineating functional and molecular impact of ex vivo sample handling in precision medicine.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional profiling of ovarian cancer models reveals Bcl-xL/NOTCH targeting to overcome resistance.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Epigenetics in lung cancer precision medicine: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Patient cell drug profiling identifies p53-linked vulnerabilities in refractory lymphoid malignancies.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- A multi-center study on the consistency of drug sensitivity testing in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular Oncodiagnostics in Precision Oncology: Integrating Tumor Transcriptomics, Patient Pharmacogenetics, and Ex Vivo Chemoresistance Testing to Improve Individual Chemotherapy Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Midostaurin response in AML is shaped by a progenitor-like cell state selectively targeted by SMAC mimetics.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond genomics: 3D microtumor assays for rapid, clinically relevant functional drug testing.Oncogene · 2025Review
- Ex vivo drug responses and molecular profiles of 597 pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Development of a robust BH3 drug toolkit for precision medicine in hematologic malignancies.Theranostics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Consistent handling of samples is crucial for achieving reproducible molecular and functional testing results in translational research. Here, we used 229 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patient samples to assess the impact of sample handling on high-throughput functional drug testing, mass spectrometry-based proteomics, and flow cytometry. Our data revealed novel and previously described changes in cell phenotype and drug response dependent on sample biobanking. Specifically, myeloid cells with a CD117 (c-KIT) positive phenotype decreased after biobanking, potentially distorting cell population representations and affecting drugs targeting these cells. Additionally, highly granular AML cell numbers decreased after freezing. Secondly, protein expression levels, as well as sensitivity to drugs targeting cell proliferation, metabolism, tyrosine kinases (e.g., JAK, KIT, FLT3), and BH3 mimetics were notably affected by biobanking. Moreover, drug response profiles of paired fresh and frozen samples showed that freezing samples can lead to systematic errors in drug sensitivity scores. While a high correlation between fresh and frozen for the entire drug library was observed, freezing cells had a considerable impact at an individual level, which could influence outcomes in translational studies. Our study highlights conditions where standardization is needed to improve reproducibility, and where validation of data generated from biobanked cohorts may be particularly important.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.