Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38389255›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2024

EMCDDA framework and practical guidance for naming cathinones.

Benedikt Pulver, Svenja Fischmann, Ana Gallegos, Rachel Christie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benedikt PulverState Bureau of Criminal Investigation Schleswig-Holstein, Forensic Science Institute, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-2111
Svenja FischmannState Bureau of Criminal Investigation Schleswig-Holstein, Forensic Science Institute, Kiel, Germany.
Ana GallegosEuropean Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rachel ChristieEuropean Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug AddictionInternal Security Fund of the European Union IZ25-5793-2016-27Internal Security Fund of the European Union IZ25-5793-2019-33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cathinones are often sold as "legal" alternatives to controlled stimulants such as amphetamine, MDMA and cocaine. Cathinones are the second largest group of new psychoactive substances (NPS), with close to 170 monitored by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Although all cathinones are related to the parent compound cathinone, one of the psychoactive principles in khat, assigning consistent, informative and user-friendly common names to these substances is challenging. Over time different naming approaches have been applied, leading to cathinones being known by several names. This work provides a framework and practical examples for the consistent naming of cathinones which is easy to understand and can be applied by the forensic community, researchers, clinical practitioners, and policy makers. The scope of the issue and rationale for earlier naming approaches are also discussed. The new naming framework has been developed based on established naming approaches and centered around the common "cathinone," and "phenone" motifs/scaffolds. The proposed framework establishes clear rules to derive the EMCDDA framework names for cathinones. Each name is, in turn, composed by a principal name containing a parent letter, derived after the "cathinone" or the "phenone" scaffold. Additional substitutions are prepended to the principal name. The framework also provides for exceptions for several cathinones and structural analogs scheduled under UN and EU legislation.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsPsychotropic DrugsCentral Nervous System StimulantsEuropeHumansIllicit DrugsTerminology as TopicAlkaloidscathinoneCentral Nervous System StimulantsIllicit DrugsPsychotropic Drugscathinonesearly warning systemharmonizationNPSsemi‐systematic naming

Identifiers

PMID38389255
PMCPMC11635063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.