ArticleDrug testing and analysis2024
EMCDDA framework and practical guidance for naming cathinones.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Trends in synthetic cathinone detection in seized drug samples submitted to the U.S. DEA's National Forensic Laboratory Information System, 2010-2024.Journal of analytical toxicology · 2026Article
- Human serum-supplemented cell culture conditions improve xenobiotic metabolism in hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Huh7.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- TRACT assay-based in vitro characterization of substituted cathinones: inhibition and release at the serotonin transporter.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- In vitro toxicokinetics and metabolic profiling of methoxycathinones and methylthiocathinones using human liver systems and hyphenated mass spectrometry.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Oral Fluid Concentrations and Pharmacological Effects of Clephedrone and Methylone in Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Observational
- Polydrug fatal intoxication involving MDPHP: Detection and in silico investigation of multiple 3,4-methylenedioxy-derived designer drugs and their metabolites.Journal of analytical toxicology · 2025Article
- EMCDDA framework and practical guidance for naming cathinones.Drug testing and analysis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cathinones are often sold as "legal" alternatives to controlled stimulants such as amphetamine, MDMA and cocaine. Cathinones are the second largest group of new psychoactive substances (NPS), with close to 170 monitored by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Although all cathinones are related to the parent compound cathinone, one of the psychoactive principles in khat, assigning consistent, informative and user-friendly common names to these substances is challenging. Over time different naming approaches have been applied, leading to cathinones being known by several names. This work provides a framework and practical examples for the consistent naming of cathinones which is easy to understand and can be applied by the forensic community, researchers, clinical practitioners, and policy makers. The scope of the issue and rationale for earlier naming approaches are also discussed. The new naming framework has been developed based on established naming approaches and centered around the common "cathinone," and "phenone" motifs/scaffolds. The proposed framework establishes clear rules to derive the EMCDDA framework names for cathinones. Each name is, in turn, composed by a principal name containing a parent letter, derived after the "cathinone" or the "phenone" scaffold. Additional substitutions are prepended to the principal name. The framework also provides for exceptions for several cathinones and structural analogs scheduled under UN and EU legislation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.