ArticlePloS one2024
Adherence to plant-based dietary patterns and anthropometric indices among primary school girls in Kerman: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Plant-Based Diets in Children and Adolescents: Current Evidence on Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiometabolic Health.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Association of dietary phytochemical index (DPI) and risk of overweight and obesity in school-aged girls in Southeast Iran.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the association between adherence to plant-based dietary patterns and anthropometric indices among primary school girls in Kerman. This cross-sectional study included 330 girls aged 6-12. A reliable and validated dish-based food frequency questionnaire was used to collect dietary data. Weight, height, and mid-arm circumference were measured, and z-score charts from the World Health Organization for girls between the ages of 5 and 19 were utilized. We used Satija et al. method to calculate plant-based diet index scores. After adjusting for age and energy, participants in the higher tertile of the overall plant-based diet index (PDI) had a lower height-for-age z score (HAZ) (0.38±0.12 vs. 0.59±0.12 kg; P = 0.033). Higher unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI) scores were significantly associated with decreased HAZ in models 2 (p = 0.028) and 3 (p = 0.035). A higher PDI score was associated with lower odds of being underweight and overweight, respectively (Model 1: P trend = 0.007, <0.001; Model 2: P trend = 0.010, 0.001). A significant inverse association was found between healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) scores and underweight risk in the crude and adjusted models. (Model 1: P trend = 0.021; model 2: P trend = 0.018; Model 3: P trend = 0.031). Higher uPDI scores were associated with increased odds of being overweight and obese in all three models (Model 1: p trend<0.001; Model 2: p trend<0.001; Model 3: p trend = 0.001). We concluded that children who followed a plant-based diet had lower odds of being overweight and obese. Higher scores on the hPDI were linked to a decreased risk of being underweight, while higher scores on the uPDI were associated with an increased risk of being overweight and obese. The study suggests healthy plant-based diet may benefit children's weight and growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.