ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Computer-Aided Discrimination of Glaucoma Patients from Healthy Subjects Using the RETeval Portable Device.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Mydriasis-Free Handheld ERG Device and Its Utility in Clinical Practice: A Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive eye disease affecting the optic nerve, which may cause visual damage and blindness. In this study, we present a machine-learning investigation to classify patients with glaucoma (case group) with respect to normal participants (control group). We examined 172 eyes at the Ophthalmology Clinic of the "Elpis" General Hospital of Athens between October 2022 and September 2023. In addition, we investigated the glaucoma classification in terms of the following: (a) eye selection and (b) gender. Our methodology was based on the features extracted via two diagnostic optical systems: (i) conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) and (ii) a modern RETeval portable device. The machine-learning approach comprised three different classifiers: the Bayesian, the Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), and Support Vectors Machines (SVMs). For all cases examined, classification accuracy was found to be significantly higher when using the RETeval device with respect to the OCT system, as follows: 14.7% for all participants, 13.4% and 29.3% for eye selection (right and left, respectively), and 25.6% and 22.6% for gender (male and female, respectively). The most efficient classifier was found to be the SVM compared to the PNN and Bayesian classifiers. In summary, all aforementioned comparisons demonstrate that the RETeval device has the advantage over the OCT system for the classification of glaucoma patients by using the machine-learning approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.