Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397731›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Safety and Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Long COVID Patients Experiencing Long-Lasting Symptoms.

Espérance Moine, Virginie Molinier, Adriana Castanyer, Amandine Calvat, Guillaume Coste, Antonin Vernet, Audrey Faugé, Perrine Magrina, Joan Lluis Aliaga-Parera, Nicolas Oliver and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Assessment and management of post-COVID-19 pulmonary complications: a rapid review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Espérance MoineDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation en Santé, Clariane, 34700 Lodève, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-1323
Virginie MolinierDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation en Santé, Clariane, 34700 Lodève, France.
Adriana CastanyerClinique du Souffle La Solane, Inicea, 66340 Osséja, France.
Amandine CalvatClinique du Souffle La Vallonie, Inicea, 34700 Lodève, France.
Guillaume CosteClinique du Souffle La Solane, Inicea, 66340 Osséja, France.
Antonin VernetClinique du Souffle La Solane, Inicea, 66340 Osséja, France.
Audrey FaugéClinique du Souffle La Vallonie, Inicea, 34700 Lodève, France.
Perrine MagrinaClinique du Souffle La Vallonie, Inicea, 34700 Lodève, France.
Joan Lluis Aliaga-PareraClinique du Souffle La Solane, Inicea, 66340 Osséja, France.
Nicolas OliverDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation en Santé, Clariane, 34700 Lodève, France.
François AlexandreDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation en Santé, Clariane, 34700 Lodève, France.
Nelly HeraudDirection de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation en Santé, Clariane, 34700 Lodève, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the high prevalence and persistence of long COVID, it is important to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients who experience long-lasting symptoms more than six months after initial COVID-19 onset. Enrolled patients were admitted for a four-week in-patient-PR due to long COVID symptoms (n = 47). The safety of PR was confirmed by the absence of adverse events. Symptom-related outcomes were evaluated pre- and post-PR with significant score changes for: 6 min walking distance (61 [28 to 103] m), quality of life (mental Short Form-12: 10 [6 to 13], and physical: 9 [6 to 12]), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (1 [0 to 3]), fatigue (MFI-20: -19 [-28 to -8]), dyspnea (DYSPNEA-12: -7 [-9 to -2] and mMRC; -1 [-1 to 0]), Nijmegen questionnaire (-8 [-11 to -5]), anxiety and depression (HADS:-4 [-5 to -2] and -2 [-4 to -1], respectively) and posttraumatic stress disorder checklist scale (-8 [-12 to -4]). At the individual level, the percentage of symptomatic patients for each outcome decreased, with a high response rate, and the number of persistent symptoms per patient was reduced from six at PR initiation to three at the end of the program. Our results show that in-PR is safe and efficient at decreasing long-lasting symptoms experienced by long COVID patients at more than six months after initial disease onset.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDyspneaHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQuality of Lifelong COVIDMCIDsmultidisciplinary interventionpost-COVID-19 syndrometreatability

Identifiers

PMID38397731
PMCPMC10888408
OpenAlexW4391933174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.