Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38399429›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review of Current and Pipeline Drugs for Treatment of Melanoma.

Nicole Natarelli, Sarah J Aleman, Isabella M Mark, Jasmine T Tran, Sean Kwak, Elizabeth Botto, Shaliz Aflatooni, Michael J Diaz, Shari R Lipner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
27.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Local Delivery of Ginger ExtractCurrent drug delivery · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole NatarelliMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-5607
Sarah J AlemanSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Isabella M MarkCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Jasmine T TranSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Sean KwakCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0398-2743
Elizabeth BottoMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA.
Shaliz AflatooniMorsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA.
Michael J DiazCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Shari R LipnerDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY 10021, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-9304
University of Florida · USUniversity of South Florida · USCornell University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Standard treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Combining these modalities often yields better responses. Surgery is suitable for localized cases, sometimes involving lymph node dissection and biopsy, to assess the spread of the disease. Radiation therapy may be sometimes used as a standalone treatment or following surgical excision. Systemic chemotherapy, while having low response rates, is utilized as part of combination treatments or when other methods fail. The development of resistance to systemic chemotherapies and associated side effects have prompted further research and clinical trials for novel approaches. In the case of advanced-stage melanoma, a comprehensive approach may be necessary, incorporating targeted therapies and immunotherapies that demonstrate significant antitumor activity. Targeted therapies, including inhibitors targeting BRAF, MEK, c-KIT, and NRAS, are designed to block the specific molecules responsible for tumor growth. These therapies show promise, particularly in patients with corresponding mutations. Combination therapy, including BRAF and MEK inhibitors, has been evidenced to improve progression-free survival; however, concerns about resistance and cutaneous toxicities highlight the need for close monitoring. Immunotherapies, leveraging tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CAR T cells, enhance immune responses. Lifileucel, an FDA-approved tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, has demonstrated improved response rates in advanced-stage melanoma. Ongoing trials continue to explore the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for advanced melanoma. Checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1 have enhanced outcomes. Emerging IL-2 therapies boost dendritic cells, enhancing anticancer immunity. Oncolytic virus therapy, approved for advanced melanoma, augments treatment efficacy in combination approaches. While immunotherapy has significantly advanced melanoma treatment, its success varies, prompting research into new drugs and factors influencing outcomes. This review provides insights into current melanoma treatments and recent therapeutic advances.

Indexed as

combination therapyimmune checkpoint inhibitionmelanomaoncolytic virus therapytargeted therapytransfer therapy

Identifiers

PMID38399429
PMCPMC10892880
OpenAlexW4391605485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.